Asee peer logo

Assessment And Evaluation Of Engineering Technology Program Outcomes Using Direct Measures

Download Paper |


2008 Annual Conference & Exposition


Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Publication Date

June 22, 2008

Start Date

June 22, 2008

End Date

June 25, 2008



Conference Session

Continuous Improvement & Assessment of ET Programs

Tagged Division

Engineering Technology

Page Count


Page Numbers

13.235.1 - 13.235.25



Permanent URL

Download Count


Request a correction

Paper Authors


Nirmal Das Georgia Southern University

visit author page

Nirmal K. Das is an associate professor of Civil Engineering Technology at Georgia Southern University. He received a Bachelor of Civil Engineering degree from Jadavpur University, India, and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Civil Engineering (structures) from Texas Tech University. His areas of interest include structural analysis, structural reliability and wind engineering. Dr. Das is a registered professional engineer in Ohio and Georgia, and is a Fellow of the American Society of Civil Engineers.

visit author page

Download Paper |

NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

Assessment and Evaluation of Engineering Technology Program Outcomes Using Direct Measures


In order to ensure the quality of a program on an ongoing basis, it is essential that a program has a sound and viable Continuous Improvement Plan. The two key elements of the plan are assessment and evaluation. The term “assessment” means one or more processes that identify, collect, use and prepare data that can be used to evaluate achievement of program outcomes and educational objectives. The term “evaluation” characterizes one or more processes for interpretation of the data and evidence accumulated through assessment practices that (a) determine the extent to which program outcomes or educational objectives are being achieved; or (b) result in decisions and actions taken to improve the program.

Multiple constituencies are to be involved in the process, as the TAC/ABET Technology Criteria 2000 (TC2K) stipulate use of multiple assessment tools and measures for (a) the program outcomes, i.e., knowledge and capabilities of students at the time of graduation and (b) the program objectives, i.e., the expected accomplishments of graduates during the first few years after graduation. Effective assessment tools provide the information needed to measure outcomes and objectives, so necessary improvements can be implemented.

The focus of this paper is on assessment of program outcomes. The primary assessment of program outcomes is based on direct measures, i.e., student work, such as assignments, exams and student portfolios related to coursework. Some such measures, which have been used by the civil engineering technology program at this institution for two specific courses, are discussed in this paper. Various templates (rubrics) used in the process are also included. An evaluation of assessment data through comparison with established benchmarks is presented to determine the extent to which program outcomes pertaining to the two courses are being achieved. Follow-up actions warranted to implement the results of program evaluation, and thus “to close the loop,” are also discussed.

I. Introduction

The basic premise of the accreditation process for engineering technology programs, in accordance with the technology criteria 2000 (TC2K)1 adopted by the TAC/ABET, is that every program must demonstrate, through documentary evidence, that program educational objectives and program outcomes are achieved. The program educational objectives are defined as broad statements that describe the career and professional accomplishments that the program is preparing graduates to achieve during the first few years following graduation. The program outcomes are defined as statements that describe what units of knowledge or skill students are expected to acquire from the program to prepare them to achieve the program educational objectives. These are typically demonstrated by the student and measured by the program at the time of graduation. The TAC/ABET designated (a – k) requirements must be included in some way in the program outcomes.

Das, N. (2008, June), Assessment And Evaluation Of Engineering Technology Program Outcomes Using Direct Measures Paper presented at 2008 Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 10.18260/1-2--3646

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2008 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015