Farmingdale State College, NY, New York
October 25, 2024
October 25, 2024
November 5, 2024
Professional Papers
8
10.18260/1-2--49427
https://peer.asee.org/49427
24
Tak Cheung, Ph.D., professor of physics, teaches in CUNY Queensborough Community College. He also conducts research and mentors student research projects.
Sunil Dehipawala received his B.S. degree from University of Peradeniya in Sri Lanka and Ph.D from City University of New York. Currently, he is working as a faculty member at Queensborough Community College of CUNY.
The learning of radiation in terms of the radiation absorption law, radiation energy spectrum, muon examination of nuclear waste, etc., have been deployed in a standard Physics-Two course with students in a community college setting. The syllabus extension to include modern topics and radiation content is necessitated due to the offering of a radiation certificate program, a collaboration of our Community College with the Brookhaven National Lab Nuclear Education and Training Program. The radiation certificate program requires two radiation courses to be taught before the fundamental Physics-Two contents. The model-based pedagogy in Physics -Two was designed to complement the phenomenon-based pedagogy in the prior RAD-1 and RAD-2 courses. The Physics-Two syllabus was adjusted with simplification in topics such as acoustic oscillation, magnetic inductor, etc. to provide additional coverage for the contents in quantum modeling, radiation, absorption, muonic technology applications, etc. The grading and assessment pedagogy followed the standard practice, as summarized conveniently by the University of South Carolina (https://sc.edu/about/offices_and_divisions/cte/teaching_resources/grading_assessment_toolbox/what_is_grade/index.php). The assessment result showed that the learning of the modern topics was not affected by the simplification of the learning of sound and magnetism topics in classical physics. The skills described by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics Occupation Outlook Handbooks for nuclear engineers and technicians were also evaluated. The nuclear engineer skills in analysis and logical thinking were compared to the nuclear technician skills in computer and critical thinking in the context of Bloom’s taxonomy. The recitation content relationship to job description on Indeed.com is discussed.
Armendariz, R., & Stalerman, C., & Cheung, T., & Dehipawala, S. (2024, October), Assessment of radiation learning in Physics-Two Course using the US Guidelines for nuclear engineer and technician careers Paper presented at 2024 Fall ASEE Mid-Atlantic Section Conference, Farmingdale State College, NY, New York. 10.18260/1-2--49427
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2024 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015