Asee peer logo

Beginning to Understand and Promote Engineering Students' Metacognitive Development

Download Paper |

Conference

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

New Orleans, Louisiana

Publication Date

June 26, 2016

Start Date

June 26, 2016

End Date

August 28, 2016

ISBN

978-0-692-68565-5

ISSN

2153-5965

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session II

Tagged Topic

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Page Count

11

DOI

10.18260/p.26372

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/26372

Download Count

582

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Patrick Cunningham Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

visit author page

Patrick Cunningham is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. During the 2013-14 academic year he has been on sabbatical in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, Patrick's educational research interests are focused on engaging students' in their development as learners (metacognition and self-regulated learning) and developing accessible tools for faculty and other instructors to use to aid their students' development as learners.

visit author page

biography

Holly M Matusovich Virginia Tech

visit author page

Dr. Matusovich is an Assistant Professor and Assistant Department Head for Graduate Programs in Virginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. She has her doctorate in Engineering Education and her strengths include qualitative and mixed methods research study design and implementation. She is/was PI/Co-PI on 8 funded research projects including a CAREER grant. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty. Her research expertise includes using motivation and related frameworks to study student engagement in learning, recruitment and retention in engineering programs and careers, faculty teaching practices and intersections of motivation and learning strategies. Matusovich has authored a book chapter, 10 journal manuscripts and more than 50 conference papers.

visit author page

biography

John Ray Morelock Virginia Tech Orcid 16x16 orcid.org/0000-0001-8043-5060

visit author page

John Morelock is a Ph.D. student at Virginia Tech. His research interests include student motivation, game-based learning, and gamified classrooms.

visit author page

biography

Deirdre-Annaliese Nicole Hunter Virginia Tech

visit author page

Dr. Deirdre Hunter conducts engineering education research at Virginia Tech and is the Director of U.S. Development at La Gran Familia de Gregory in Chihuahua, Mexico. Her current research is in the areas of problem-based learning facilitation and teaching metacognition. Her research strengths include research design and implementation using qualitative methods. She has a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech, a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Syracuse University, and a A.S. in Engineering Science from Onondaga Community College, NY.

visit author page

Download Paper |

Abstract

Metacognition, defined as the knowledge and regulation of one’s own cognitive processes, is critically important to student learning and particularly instrumental in problem-solving. Despite the importance of metacognition, much of the research has occurred in controlled research settings such that much less is known about how to help students develop metacognitive skills in classroom settings. Further, there are significant bodies of research on the role of metacognition in writing and solving math problems, but little work has been done on the role of metacognition within engineering disciplines. Metacognition is particularly important in the training and development of engineers as problem solvers.

The purpose of this project is to generate transferable tools which can be used to teach and evaluate undergraduate engineering students’ metacognitive skills. To accomplish this, we are working through a three-phase project in which we pilot a metacognitive intervention in one context, translate the intervention to a new context, and share the intervention and provide training on how to use it. This paper reports on the outcomes from Phase 1, which is focused on the development and pilot implementation of metacognitive interventions for a sophomore engineering course at a small undergraduate-focused engineering school and assessing student’s metacognitive development. The intervention made up of six modules containing paired training videos on metacognitive knowledge and awareness, contextualized in-class activities, and metacognitive assignments that provide opportunities to practice metacognitive regulation. In Phase 2, we will use the research outcomes from Phase 1 to revise the intervention and translate it to a second engineering education context, a freshman course at a large comprehensive state land-grant university.

We measure students’ metacognitive development through pre- and post- interviews and surveys, that is, early in the term and late in the term after most of the interventions, and through analysis of students’ responses on post video questions, in-class activities, and metacogntive assignments. The assignments are designed to promote student metacogntive awareness and help them practice metacognitive regulation.

Our initial analysis of the data demonstrates several themes. While students seem to have more sophisticated views of what learning is, e.g., being able to apply knowledge to new or real-world problems, the strategies they rely on do not promote such deeper learning. In the pilot course they primarily rely on example, practice, and homework problems. Many students also reference reviewing their notes. These are rehearsal strategies focused on memorization of particular solution processes and pattern matching. This sets students up for an illusion of comprehension where they confuse familiarity with understanding. As students work on problems they are committed to working alone or at least first working problems on their own before checking or seeking help. This is a positive approach, but perhaps is confounded by poor monitoring strategies that do not accurately assess their real understanding. Students show movement to more elaborative and organizational study strategies, which promote deeper learning, in their responses to intervention assignments.

Cunningham, P., & Matusovich, H. M., & Morelock, J. R., & Hunter, D. N. (2016, June), Beginning to Understand and Promote Engineering Students' Metacognitive Development Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana. 10.18260/p.26372

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2016 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015