Asee peer logo

Best Practices In Implementing An Engineering Mid Program Assessment

Download Paper |

Conference

2002 Annual Conference

Location

Montreal, Canada

Publication Date

June 16, 2002

Start Date

June 16, 2002

End Date

June 19, 2002

ISSN

2153-5965

Conference Session

Design, Assessment, and Curriculum

Page Count

14

Page Numbers

7.257.1 - 7.257.14

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/11095

Download Count

116

Request a correction

Paper Authors

author page

Teodora Rutar

author page

Steven Beyerlein

author page

Phillip Thompson

author page

Lawrence McKenzie

author page

Denny Davis

author page

Kenneth Gentili

author page

Patricia Daniels

author page

Michael Trevisan

Download Paper |

Abstract
NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

Main Menu Session # 3425

PRACTICES FOR QUALITY IMPLEMENTATION OF THE TIDEE “DESIGN TEAM READINESS ASSESSMENT”

Denny Davis, Michael Trevisan, Larry McKenzie Washington State University

Steven Beyerlein University of Idaho

Patricia Daniels, Teodora Rutar, and Philip Thompson Seattle University

Kenneth Gentili Tacoma Community College

ABSTRACT

This paper outlines practices that ensure quality in administering, interpreting, reporting, and maintaining the ‘Design Team Readiness Assessment’ developed by the Transferable Integrated Design Engineering Education (TIDEE) consortium in the Pacific Northwest. A copy of the instrument can be downloaded from www.cea.wsu.edu/tidee. The instrument assesses design process, teamwork, and design communication skills in three different contexts. Previous work has demonstrated how to achieve high inter-rater reliability through explicit scoring criteria and decision rules. For this reason, the ‘Design Team Readiness Assessment’ can be used to evaluate the preparation of beginning and mid-level engineering and engineering technology students across institutions and degree programs. Faculty who have implemented the instrument have found it to be a valuable classroom tool, promoting self-awareness of life-long learning skills in a variety of course settings and supporting action research on lower-division design experiences. Their discoveries are summarized here using a framework for assessment literacy that is widely used in the K-12 education community.

ROLE OF EARLY-PROGRAM ASSESSMENT

Representatives of both industry and academia rank design process, teamwork, and communication among the top five capabilities that emerging engineers need to possess 1. In response to such expectations, ABET Engineering Criteria 2000 now requires programs seeking accreditation to not only develop key competency areas such as these, but also to devise methods for assessing achievement and stimulating improvement in supporting skill sets 2. Because these skill sets are multi-faceted and span developmental levels, they are ideally addressed and assessed at multiple points in the curriculum3,4. A special challenge occurs in assessing capabilities of students who transfer among institutions and degree programs during their academic career. This situation, along with a passion for improving the quality of design education, was the challenge that inspired the formation of the Transferable Integrated Design Engineering Education (TIDEE) consortium5.

Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Education

Main Menu

Rutar, T., & Beyerlein, S., & Thompson, P., & McKenzie, L., & Davis, D., & Gentili, K., & Daniels, P., & Trevisan, M. (2002, June), Best Practices In Implementing An Engineering Mid Program Assessment Paper presented at 2002 Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada. https://peer.asee.org/11095

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2002 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015