June 15, 2019
June 15, 2019
October 19, 2019
Using Machine Tools to Analyze Changes in Students’ Ethical Thinking
Engineering ethics education entails the development of the ability to recognize the social, cultural, environmental, and global implications of engineering practice. Instructional activities often involve discourse among students and verbal and written responses to ethical issues and dilemmas. The present research applies two machine methods to extract the dominant concepts in engineering undergraduates’ essays that were written at the beginning and end of an engineering ethics course. The two methods were Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) and naïve Bayesian analysis. Both methods showed little overall change in the conceptual basis of beginning versus end of semester essays. Closer analyses of the Bayesian results suggested there were observable individual differences in the essays. Further analysis of these differences may aid in better understanding which students changed their ethical thinking from the beginning to the end of the course. In the Discussion we suggest several ways in which success with these machine methods could aid instruction.
Taraban, R., & Marcy, W. M., & Koduru, L., & Schumacher, J. R., & Iserman, M. (2019, June), Board 74: Using Machine Tools to Analyze Changes in Students’ Ethical Thinking Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2--32420
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2019 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015