June 15, 2019
June 15, 2019
June 19, 2019
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
This case study describes the evaluation of a professional learning institute (PLI) implemented in the college of engineering (COE) at a mid-sized university in the Western region of the United States.
The original goal of the PLI (established in 2007) was to encourage the development of engineering students’ professional skills required for ABET accreditation and often lacking from the traditional engineering curriculum. Engineering education largely focuses on science, technology, and mathematics as its core content . This emphasis on technical skills, combined with lack of in-class time spent on professional development, inadvertently sends the message that professional skills, such as communication and leadership, are secondary to engineering . However, professional skills have become even more valuable than ever as engineers are expected to work in diverse, interdisciplinary teams .
Our evaluation of the PLI was a part of a larger project aimed at investigating student attitudes towards professional development. COE students were surveyed about their overall attitudes towards ABET professional skills: communication, ethics, cultural adaptability, leadership, teamwork, innovation, and civic and public engagement. They were also asked whether the PLI, in its 10th year of operation, was effective, valuable, and engaging. Open-ended comment boxes were included on the survey. Out of 2628 COE students, 534 completed the entire survey, for a typical online survey response rate of 20% . The sample was proportionately representative of the COE student makeup across grade levels, sex, race, and major.
Results of analyses of variance on the quantitative data and content analyses of 310 distinct comments showed that students expressed value for developing skills in the ABET areas. However, negative comments specifically aimed at the PLI overwhelmingly outnumbered positive comments. Non-traditional students indicated the PLI was a waste of time, mostly due to a lack of acknowledgment or credit for their relevant work experiences. There was no “test-out” capability incorporated into the PLI. Both non-traditional and traditional students commented on an already heavy course load, time better spent studying technical course content, PLI requirements considered an “extra” and not part of their curriculum, and the poor administration of the PLI. Most common suggestion for improvement included “if it’s that important incorporate professional development into the core curriculum.”
Largely due to our study results, which were released at the same time the electrical and computer engineering program began integrating skill development into their major (as part of an NSF grant to revolutionize engineering education), the PLI was removed as a graduation requirement and rebranded as a career development resource. In its place, each engineering department within the COE is responsible for integrating professional skill development into their existing curriculum. This new approach focuses on the integration of professional and technical skills, as opposed to treating professional skill development as secondary to technical skill development.
 Farr & Brazil, 2010  Byrne, Weston, & Cave, 2018  www.aaes.org  Nulty, 2008
Cave, K. A., & Byrne, Z. S., & Siller, T. J., & Maciejewski, A. A. (2019, June), Board 89: What Engineering Students Think About How They Learn Professional Skills Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2--32453
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2019 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015