Williams, M., & Drummond, C. K., & Solomon, D. (2023, June), Board 9: Work in Progress: A Case Study in Product Liability: Promoting Student Engagement with Standards.   Paper presented at 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore , Maryland. 10.18260/1-2--42989

\bibitem{asee_peer_42989}
  Williams, M., \& Drummond, C. K., \& Solomon, D. (2023, June), \emph{Board 9: Work in Progress: A Case Study in Product Liability: Promoting Student Engagement with Standards. }
  Paper presented at 2023 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition, Baltimore , Maryland.
  10.18260/1-2--42989

Matthew Williams, Colin K Drummond, and Daniela Solomon.  "Board 9: Work in Progress: A Case Study in Product Liability: Promoting Student Engagement with Standards. ".  2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore , Maryland, 2023, June.  ASEE Conferences, 2023.  https://peer.asee.org/42989 Internet.  10 Oct, 2024

\bibitem{asee_peer_42989}
  Matthew Williams, Colin K Drummond, and Daniela Solomon.
  "Board 9: Work in Progress: A Case Study in Product Liability: Promoting Student Engagement with Standards. ".
  \emph{2023 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition, Baltimore , Maryland, 2023, June}.
  ASEE Conferences, 2023.
  https://peer.asee.org/42989 Internet.  10 Oct, 2024

@INPROCEEDINGS{asee_peer_42989
author = "Matthew Williams, Colin K Drummond, and Daniela Solomon"
title = "Board 9: Work in Progress: A Case Study in Product Liability: Promoting Student Engagement with Standards. "
booktitle = "2023 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition"
year = "2023"
month = "June"
address = "Baltimore , Maryland"
publisher = "ASEE Conferences"
note = {https://peer.asee.org/42989}
number = {10.18260/1-2--42989}
}

TY  - CPAPER
AB  - This study reports on an initiative to engage biomedical engineering students with technical standards through a product liability in-class activity similar to a moot court. Working in teams, students are provided with an ambiguous case study that they have to investigate and engage in a debate as part of the prosecution or the defense team to convince the rest of the class whether standards compliance had a role in the product liability case or not. Of specific interest in this work are (a) the positioning of the case study in terms of how standards can be taught in an engaging way, (b) the specific cybersecurity case that has been explored, and (c ) the survey strategy for outcomes assessment.  Our inaugural in-class exercise produced insights that could be of use to other engineering programs.

AU  - Matthew Williams
AU  - Colin K Drummond
AU  - Daniela Solomon
CY  - Baltimore , Maryland
DA  - 2023/06/25
PB  - ASEE Conferences
TI  - Board 9: Work in Progress: A Case Study in Product Liability: Promoting Student Engagement with Standards. 
UR  - https://peer.asee.org/42989
DO  - 10.18260/1-2--42989
ER  -