Asee peer logo

Board 94: A Conceptual Model for Engineering Major Choice

Download Paper |


2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition


Salt Lake City, Utah

Publication Date

June 23, 2018

Start Date

June 23, 2018

End Date

July 27, 2018

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Tagged Topics

Diversity and NSF Grantees Poster Session

Page Count




Permanent URL

Download Count


Request a correction

Paper Authors


Joyce B. Main Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Orcid 16x16

visit author page

Joyce B. Main is Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a Ph.D. in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University, and an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy from the Harvard Graduate School of Education.

visit author page


Xinrui (rose) Xu Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

visit author page

Xinrui (Rose) Xu is a doctoral student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She also serves as a career consultant at the Purdue University Center for Career Opportunities. She received a bachelor’s degree in computer engineering, and a Master’s degree in counseling and counselor education. Her research interests include student career development and pathways, student major choice, diversity in engineering, and student mental health.

visit author page


Alexandra Marie Dukes Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

visit author page

Alexandra Dukes is a graduate student in the Aeronautics and Astronautics Engineering department with a concentration in Aerospace Systems at Purdue University. She is interested in broadening the diversity of engineering and the analysis of system architectures within industry. More specifically, her work examines the pathways of students into engineering and the effects of management personalities on a product life cycle.

visit author page

Download Paper |


Although initiatives and programs designed to broaden participation in academic institutions have generated many positive changes, the proportions of women, African American, Hispanic, and Native American students have not seen commensurate increases in engineering fields. Focusing on diversity at the discipline level has important implications for the design of effective department level programs and curricular interventions to promote participation and persistence of a broad range of students. This research study therefore applies a mixed methods approach to focus on a critical decision juncture—selection into an engineering major—to identify the prevailing patterns of engineering discipline composition. This study focuses on why students choose to major in engineering as a function of student gender, race/ethnicity, academic experiences, institutional programs, and student future plans and goals. Data comprise 39 individual student interviews, as well as over 20,000 student-level transcript data matriculating between 2001 and 2015 at a large Midwestern research university. Using organizational demography (Wharton, 1992) and social cognitive theory of self-regulation (Bandura, 1991) as theoretical frameworks, regression analyses were applied to identify factors that influence student selection into and persistence in engineering majors, while thematic analysis/grounded theory were used to analyze the interview transcripts.

Among the findings, students cite the following reasons for majoring in engineering: (1) parental influence, (2) high school teachers and programs, (3) college curriculum and programs, (4) professional/career-related aspirations, and (5) desires to help society. The authors synthesized the quantitative and qualitative findings to develop a conceptual model describing the process of major selection. Regression results show variation in likelihood of selecting certain engineering majors based on student demographic factors and first-year engineering GPA. Research findings provide important context and information for various potential applications to increase discipline-specific engineering diversity, such as developing new strategies/interventions to support success among underrepresented students, identifying overlooked areas in classroom environments, providing critical information for the development of surveys and larger-scale studies for investigating diversity across engineering. University administrators, faculty, and stakeholders could use these findings to help develop strategies to encourage more women and underrepresented students to pursue engineering and to consider more fully the wide range of engineering disciplines available.

Main, J. B., & Xu, X. R., & Dukes, A. M. (2018, June), Board 94: A Conceptual Model for Engineering Major Choice Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Salt Lake City, Utah. 10.18260/1-2--30142

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2018 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015