Chicago, Illinois
June 18, 2006
June 18, 2006
June 21, 2006
2153-5965
14
11.1461.1 - 11.1461.14
10.18260/1-2--377
https://peer.asee.org/377
485
“Breakthrough into Performance”: How Understanding Communication as Performance Can Transform Teaching, Learning, Assessment and Curriculum
Abstract
The Engineering Communications Program (ECP) in the College of Engineering at Cornell University is gradually integrating a new understanding of communication. That understanding is technical and professional communication as performance. It is particularly responsive to many of the difficulties related to establishing an effective communications curriculum. First, it offers engineering faculty a common understanding of communication. Second, through focusing on those elements shared by all communicative performances – genre, context, identity, and purpose – it enables faculty to adapt their instructional approach in ways that acknowledge the diversity of possible performances while maintaining coherence. Third, it allows faculty to employ a useful methodology, discourse analysis, for doing assessment as educational research. This paper presents communication as performance, offers discourse analysis as a methodology for researching those performances, and suggests how communicative performance, when matched with discourse analysis, can provide a dynamic model for a new communications curriculum that emerges from within the community of practice that is engineering.
Keywords: communication, performance, community of practice, discourse analysis, assessment, curriculum.
Communication as an Individual Skill
The metaphor that describes communication as a “skill” has dominated our ways of thinking about the teaching of communication, perhaps more importantly, communication itself for over a century1, 2, 3, 4. Consequently, our academic institutions, to the extent that they address issues related to communication instruction – most notably, reading and writing, speaking (oral presentations) and talking (cooperative/collaborative group/team work) – make four assumptions: 1) that communication is an individual skill; 2) that that skill can be separated from the knowledge and/or understanding of a particular subject, area, or field; 3) that that skill is both discrete and generalizable; and 4) that, as a skill, communication can be mastered5.
Evans, R., & Gabriel, J. (2006, June), “Breakthrough Into Performance”: How Understanding Communication As Performance Can Transform Teaching, Learning, Assessment And Curriculum Paper presented at 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago, Illinois. 10.18260/1-2--377
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2006 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015