June 24, 2007
June 24, 2007
June 27, 2007
Energy Conversion and Conservation
12.330.1 - 12.330.40
Building as a Power Plant: Modeling and Selection of a Combined Heat and Power System for an Advanced Commercial Building Abstract
In this Mechanical Engineering senior project, combined heat and power (CHP) systems were evaluated based on their effectiveness in supplying the energy requirements of a planned building on the Carnegie Mellon University campus. Initial feasibility studies found that three system types could potentially meet the energy needs of the building in a cost-effective manner: a diesel engine-generator system with heat recovery exchangers, a gas microturbine with an exhaust gas boiler, and a high temperature fuel cell with heat recovery exchangers. Using engineering equation solver (EES) software, the thermodynamics of each system was modeled to assess its useful thermal output for different system sizes. The thermodynamic analysis determined the necessary system size needed to meet the predicted maximum thermal load of the building. The required system sizes are (reported as maximum electrical power output): two 115 kW diesel engine-generator sets, a 250 kW microturbine, or two 250 kW high temperature fuel cells.
After sizing the systems, a cash flow analysis model was constructed to evaluate each system under varying assumptions regarding utility rates, fuel costs, and renewable energy incentive programs. Systems utilizing commonly used fuels (natural gas and diesel fuel), as well as biofuels (biogas and biodiesel) were considered in the analysis. Potential systems were also compared to a traditional system comprised of a natural gas fueled HVAC system with building electrical energy needs being supplied by the local utility. The economic model incorporates realistic system and fuel pricing from quotes received from system manufacturers and distributors. The economic model uses operating parameters for each system, along with three different utility rate structures, and calculates the internal rate of return assuming a 20 year system life. Based on the results obtained from the economic analysis, a natural gas fueled microturbine and diesel fueled engine-generator set are best choices for the combined heat and power system. They offer comparable rates of return in each scenario, and are unaffected by the unpredictability of renewable energy buyback incentives. The microturbine offers more adaptability while the diesel engine-generator offers a lower capital investment.
This paper was generated from a mechanical engineering senior design project at the Milwaukee School of Engineering (MSOE). The mechanical engineering program at MSOE requires students to complete a two trimester course, 6 credit hour sequence. This course sequence is taken during the Fall and Winter trimesters of the senior year. In accordance with ABET criteria for engineering programs, the faculty at MSOE strive to develop design projects for students that are based on the knowledge and skills developed in earlier coursework and incorporate realistic constraints that include economic, environmental, and sustainability considerations.
This project was spawned from an ongoing research collaboration between Dr. Damm of MSOE and Drs. Archer and Hartkopf of CMU. Dr. Damm picked two students, Brendan Egan and Stephen Dechant, and suggested they design an energy supply system for an advanced
Egan, B., & Dechant, S., & Damm, C. (2007, June), Building As A Power Plant: Modeling And Selection Of A Combined Heat And Power System For An Advanced Commercial Building Paper presented at 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, Hawaii. https://peer.asee.org/2228
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2007 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015