New Orleans, Louisiana
June 26, 2016
June 26, 2016
June 29, 2016
978-0-692-68565-5
2153-5965
Mechanics
7
10.18260/p.26429
https://peer.asee.org/26429
566
Julian received his Ph.D. from Virginia Tech in Engineering Mechanics in 2007. He spent a semester teaching at community college in the area and then spent two years at University of Massachusetts continuing his research in finite element modeling and biomechanics and continuing to teach. In 2010, he began his current tenure track position at the University of Southern Indiana.
Tom McDonald is an Associate Professor in the Engineering Department at the University of Southern Indiana. Prior to joining USI he taught for six years in the School of Technology at Eastern Illinois University. He earned his BSIE and MSIE degrees in Industrial Engineering from Clemson University and his PhD in Industrial and Systems Engineering from Virginia Tech.
His research and teaching interests primarily include lean manufacturing, discrete event simulation and modeling, and engineering economy. Tom has been involved in lean manufacturing and modeling of production lines since 1999 and has worked with private organizations such as Danaher/Kollmorgen and AT&T.
Online homework systems have been used in math, engineering and other sciences for several years to distribute, collect and assess homework problems. As these systems have grown publishers have added beneficial features such as hints, based on student input and the ability to assess electronically drawn diagrams. Many studies have shown that there is no significant difference between different modes of homework delivery (handwritten, online or a hybrid of the two) and the success of a student within the class. However, missing from online homework systems is the assessment a student’s ability to present a clear and logical solution: technical communication.
The objective of this study is to assess the relationship between student's ability to present a clear and organized solution and their ability to correctly solve a problem. A 4 section rubric is used to score homework and exam problems over 3 semesters of mechanics classes (Statics and Dynamics). Included in the rubric are scores associated with solving the problem: the Solution score, and a Presentation score evaluating the organization of the solution.
Analysis of these data (over 1,000 samples), indicate a significant positive relationship between the Presentation score and the Solution score. With such a strong correlation between a students’ ability to present a logical problem solving process and their ability to formulate & solve engineering problems, should we not consider teaching students how to effectively present their work?
Davis, J. L., & McDonald, T. (2016, June), Can Enforcing an Organized Solution Lead to Better Grades? Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana. 10.18260/p.26429
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2016 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015