June 22, 2003
June 22, 2003
June 25, 2003
8.281.1 - 8.281.11
Grading Capstone Designs: On Time and On Target
Major Craig Quadrato, Lieutenant Colonel Ronald W. Welch United States Military Academy
ABET criteria, emergency response and prevention, and an ever increasing demand for impacting the production schedule is accelerating the need for engineers to become broad-based leaders instead of just highly trained technicians. In order to prepare engineering students for such an environment, design courses are more routinely requiring students to complete open- ended, real-life design problems. Such problems require a different grading process than those that have an easily defined solution. This paper explains how, through the use of a blended criteria and norm based assessment and evaluation process, to clearly communicate standards and outcomes, fairly grade dissimilar designs, and effectively encourage continuous improvement of design products. Evidence of these outcomes will be assessed through the statistical analysis of student feedback from the United States Military Academy.
United States Military Academy (USMA) civil engineering majors are required to complete a one-semester capstone design project as a requirement for graduation. The capstone design provides the best integrated experience to assess student performance on the USMA Civil Engineering program objectives listed in Figure 1.
Civil Engineering Program Objectives Supported by the Capstone Design
• Application of engineering thought process to design CE components and systems • Creativity • Proficiency in structural engineering • Proficiency in environmental engineering • Proficiency in hydrology & hydraulic engineering • Proficiency in geotechnical engineering • Proficiency in mathematics • Proficiency in calculus-based physics • Functioning on multidisciplinary teams • Understanding and performance of roles and responsibilities of civil engineers and the issues / professional practice • Use of modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice • Effective writing • Effective speaking • Broad education /understanding of the impact of engineering solutions in a global/societal context • Preparation for and willingness to pursue continued intellectual and professional growth
Figure 1. CE Program Objectives Supported by the Capstone Design
Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003 American Society for Engineering Education
Quadrato, C., & Welch, R. (2003, June), Capstone Design Grading On Time And On Target Paper presented at 2003 Annual Conference, Nashville, Tennessee. 10.18260/1-2--12484
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2003 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015