June 24, 2017
June 24, 2017
June 28, 2017
Educational Research and Methods
This theory paper suggests a contrasting pair of frames through which to view faculty attempts to adopt curricular cultures, as when introducing new pedagogies into courses. Attempts that use a cargo cult framing treat novel pedagogies as writ, copying practices without interrogating underlying meaning. In contrast, attempts that use a cognitive apprenticeship framing presume that expertise comes through scaffolded, reflective, and social performance leading toward contextually adaptable mastery. These contrasting frames, supported by case studies, provide a theoretical basis for improved curricular culture change.
Chua, M., & Stein, L. A. (2017, June), Cargo Cults and Cognitive Apprenticeships: Two Frameworks for Adopting Unfamiliar Curricular Cultures Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. 10.18260/1-2--28014
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2017 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015