Case Study: Essentials of the Nurse+Engineer: Differentiating and Integrating Humans and Nature in Civil Engineering

Daniel B Oerther; Sarah Oerther

Download Paper | Permalink

Conference: 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Publication Date: June 22, 2025
Start Date: June 22, 2025
End Date: August 15, 2025
Conference Session: Sustainability & Civil Engineering
Tagged Division: Civil Engineering Division (CIVIL)
Page Count: 13
Permanent URL: https://peer.asee.org/56065

Paper Authors

biography

Daniel B Oerther P.E. Missouri University of Science and Technology orcid.org/0000-0002-6724-3205

visit author page

Professor Daniel B. Oerther, PhD, PE joined the faculty of the Missouri University of Science and Technology in 2010 as the John A. and Susan Mathes Chair of Civil Engineering after serving for ten years on the faculty of the University of Cincinnati where he was head of the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. Professor Oerther is internationally recognized for leadership of engineers, sanitarians, and nurses promoting the practice the sustainable development, local to global. Dan is a Past President of the American Academy of Environmental Engineers and Scientists. He is a Diplomate of the American Academy of Sanitarians. Dan is a Fellow of the Association of Environmental Engineering and Science Professors, the American Academy of Nursing, and the National League for Nursing. In the United Kingdom, he is a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Environmental Health, the Royal Society for Public Health, and the Society of Operations Engineers. Professor Oerther's awards as an educator include the Excellence in Environmental Engineering Education Award from the American Academy of Environmental Engineers and Scientists, the Gordon Maskew Fair Distinguished Engineering Educator Medal from the Water Environment Federation, the Engineering Education Excellence Award from the National Society of Professional Engineers, and the Robert G. Quinn Award from the American Society for Engineering Education.

visit author page

author page

Sarah Oerther

Download Paper | Permalink

Abstract

Increasingly civil engineers are being asked to consider a lens of planetary health, which is focused on analyzing and addressing the impacts of human disruptions to Earth’s natural systems on human health and all life on Earth. But what are “natural systems”? And how would a civil engineer answer the question, “are people a part of nature, or separate from nature?” One way to improve how civil engineers differentiate and integrate humans and nature is to borrow from the adjacent profession of nursing.

To provide civil engineers with an appropriate theoretical lens to understand humans and nature, two theories from nursing were incorporated into a teaching module that emphasizes engineering ethics, including the ASCE Code of Ethics. The first is the “Environmental Theory” of Florence Nightingale, the founder of modern nursing, who explains that, “…the chief purpose of the [nurse or engineer] is to modify the environment to prevent illness and enhance healing.” As part of the same module, students are introduced to the “Nursing Need Theory” of Virginia Henderson who noted that the, “unique function of the [nurse or engineer] is to assist the individual, sick or well, in the performance of those activities contributing to health or its recovery (or to peaceful death) that he would perform unaided if he had the necessary strength, will, or knowledge.” Thus, human health, and the health of the environment upon which human health ultimately depends for clean air, clean water, nutritious food, and protection from the elements, are interrelated and inseparable such that damage to the planetary environment must be viewed as damage to human health.

This module was incorporated into an existing department-wide required course entitled, “Fundamentals of Environmental Engineering.” This course is required of undergraduate students of civil engineering, architectural engineering, and environmental engineering. This article includes content and pedagogical details of the module as well as evaluations of student learning and assessments of instructor teaching. This study builds upon our prior result, which reported on a module leveraging nursing theory to create an improved understanding of “public” as part of the code of ethics where an engineer “holds paramount the health, safety, and welfare of the public”.

As educators equip students of civil engineering to “change the world,” there is a benefit of “borrowing” theory from the adjacent profession of nursing to improve understanding within pre-service learning as well as in the professional practice of civil engineering.

Citation
Format

Oerther, D. B., & Oerther, S. (2025, June), Case Study: Essentials of the Nurse+Engineer: Differentiating and Integrating Humans and Nature in Civil Engineering Paper presented at 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Montreal, Quebec, Canada . https://peer.asee.org/56065

TY  - CPAPER
AB  - Increasingly civil engineers are being asked to consider a lens of planetary health, which is focused on analyzing and addressing the impacts of human disruptions to Earth’s natural systems on human health and all life on Earth. But what are “natural systems”? And how would a civil engineer answer the question, “are people a part of nature, or separate from nature?” One way to improve how civil engineers differentiate and integrate humans and nature is to borrow from the adjacent profession of nursing.

To provide civil engineers with an appropriate theoretical lens to understand humans and nature, two theories from nursing were incorporated into a teaching module that emphasizes engineering ethics, including the ASCE Code of Ethics. The first is the “Environmental Theory” of Florence Nightingale, the founder of modern nursing, who explains that, “…the chief purpose of the [nurse or engineer] is to modify the environment to prevent illness and enhance healing.” As part of the same module, students are introduced to the “Nursing Need Theory” of Virginia Henderson who noted that the, “unique function of the [nurse or engineer] is to assist the individual, sick or well, in the performance of those activities contributing to health or its recovery (or to peaceful death) that he would perform unaided if he had the necessary strength, will, or knowledge.” Thus, human health, and the health of the environment upon which human health ultimately depends for clean air, clean water, nutritious food, and protection from the elements, are interrelated and inseparable such that damage to the planetary environment must be viewed as damage to human health.

This module was incorporated into an existing department-wide required course entitled, “Fundamentals of Environmental Engineering.” This course is required of undergraduate students of civil engineering, architectural engineering, and environmental engineering. This article includes content and pedagogical details of the module as well as evaluations of student learning and assessments of instructor teaching. This study builds upon our prior result, which reported on a module leveraging nursing theory to create an improved understanding of “public” as part of the code of ethics where an engineer “holds paramount the health, safety, and welfare of the public”.

As educators equip students of civil engineering to “change the world,” there is a benefit of “borrowing” theory from the adjacent profession of nursing to improve understanding within pre-service learning as well as in the professional practice of civil engineering.



AU  - Daniel B Oerther P.E.
AU  - Sarah Oerther
CY  - Montreal, Quebec, Canada 
DA  - 2025/06/22
PB  - ASEE Conferences
TI  - Case Study: Essentials of the Nurse+Engineer: Differentiating and Integrating Humans and Nature in Civil Engineering
UR  - https://peer.asee.org/56065
ER  -