Jamieson, M. V., & Shaw, J. M. (2018, June), CATME or ITP Metrics? Which One Should I Use for Design Team Development and Assessment?  Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Salt Lake City, Utah. 10.18260/1-2--30179

\bibitem{asee_peer_30179}
  Jamieson, M. V., \& Shaw, J. M. (2018, June), \emph{CATME or ITP Metrics? Which One Should I Use for Design Team Development and Assessment?}
  Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition , Salt Lake City, Utah.
  10.18260/1-2--30179

Marnie V. Jamieson and John M. Shaw.  "CATME or ITP Metrics? Which One Should I Use for Design Team Development and Assessment?".  2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Salt Lake City, Utah, 2018, June.  ASEE Conferences, 2018.  https://peer.asee.org/30179 Internet.  13 Dec, 2024

\bibitem{asee_peer_30179}
  Marnie V. Jamieson and John M. Shaw.
  "CATME or ITP Metrics? Which One Should I Use for Design Team Development and Assessment?".
  \emph{2018 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition , Salt Lake City, Utah, 2018, June}.
  ASEE Conferences, 2018.
  https://peer.asee.org/30179 Internet.  13 Dec, 2024

@INPROCEEDINGS{asee_peer_30179
author = "Marnie V. Jamieson and John M. Shaw"
title = "CATME or ITP Metrics? Which One Should I Use for Design Team Development and Assessment?"
booktitle = "2018 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition "
year = "2018"
month = "June"
address = "Salt Lake City, Utah"
publisher = "ASEE Conferences"
note = {https://peer.asee.org/30179}
number = {10.18260/1-2--30179}
}

TY  - CPAPER
AB  - Abstract
The characteristics of and the correlation of high performing teams with individual satisfaction and excellent task results have been studied extensively. Consequently, these characteristics have become selection criteria for new graduates, and development and performance benchmarks for employees and entrepreneurs alike, that define aspects of corporate culture. The University of Alberta Faculty of Engineering design, and engineering and safety risk management instructors have been using the Comprehensive Assessment of Team Member Effectiveness (CATME) from Purdue University for peer evaluation and team selection for the past several years.  Different departments use CATME to varying degrees and for various purposes. The Individual and Team Performance Metrics Lab (ITP Metrics), at the University of Calgary Psychology Department in cooperation with the Schulich School of Engineering also at the University of Calgary have developed a set of research-backed team and leadership tools including peer evaluation tools and team formation tools for student and industry use. These on-line assessment tools differ in methodology, scope, emphasis user interface, feedback format, and cost.  The selection of a peer evaluation and feedback system, for student use and evaluation, should consider the development of skills, as well as the reliability of the method to assess differential grades for students on teams when required.  The method of data collection, the type of feedback and the contextual validity of the feedback may impact students’ development of useful team behaviours and personal strategies for working in team environments. In this contribution, a comparative analysis of CATME and ITP Metrics is provided. Instructor experiences with these assessment tools are then reported and discussed based on student pre and post skill self-evaluation in a design course where CATME and then ITP Metrics evaluations were used for sequential student cohorts. 


AU  - Marnie V. Jamieson
AU  - John M. Shaw
CY  - Salt Lake City, Utah
DA  - 2018/06/23
PB  - ASEE Conferences
TI  - CATME or ITP Metrics? Which One Should I Use for Design Team Development and Assessment?
UR  - https://peer.asee.org/30179
DO  - 10.18260/1-2--30179
ER  -