Centering equity in an NSF engineering education alliance: Considerations for complex, multi stakeholder work

Rebecca Zarch; Monica McGill

Download Paper | Permalink

Conference: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Location: Baltimore , Maryland
Publication Date: June 25, 2023
Start Date: June 25, 2023
End Date: June 28, 2023
Conference Session: Advancing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Tagged Division: Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)
Tagged Topic: Diversity
Page Count: 20
DOI: 10.18260/1-2--43147
Permanent URL: https://peer.asee.org/43147
Download Count: 179

Monica McGill is President & CEO of CSEdResearch.org and a Temporary Research Specialist at Knox College. Her area of scholarship is K-12 computer science and cybersecurity education research with a current focus on diversity and improving the quality of research.

visit author page

Download Paper | Permalink

Abstract

Problem: Increasing the graduation rates of BIPOC+ and women in the engineering field is at the core of this multi-institutional Alliance. The work described in this piece of a larger project centers on an equity-lens for both internal and external collaborative work with the common goal of diversifying the engineering field.

Research Questions: There are two research questions. 1) How is equity understood and centered in the work of the Alliance from the perspective of the collaborators? 2) How do well established professionals, who have been working in the engineering field for decades, think outside the box to implement new best and promising practices for recruiting, retaining and graduating BIPOC and women engineering students?

Methodology: In this qualitative study, we used the framework known as the GEAR Model (Getting Equity Advocacy Results) to develop semi-structured interview questions for collaborators within a multi-institutional Alliance. In total we completed 15 interviews, which were recorded and transcribed for coding purposes.The interviews were transcribed using the “Gold Standard,” which is an approach where one member of the research team codes all of the narratives in the data set, setting the standard. A second member of the research team serves as the reliability coder. The reliability coder codes a subset of the total data set, but that person’s coding is used only to establish interrater reliability with the master coder; it is the coding of the master coder that is used in the final analysis. The proportion coded by the reliability coder will depend on the size and complexity of the data set, but a common figure is 20% of the total data set (e.g., Lilgendahl & McAdams, 2011; McLean & Pratt, 2006).

Findings: Several common themes emerged from coded interviews. The themes that were found include a lack of common voice and knowledge, top-down decision making, lack of organization resulting in slow movement, communition, and the focus on equity as an overarching goal, but lack in the internal workings of the Alliance.

Implications: Based on this research, the Alliance is moving forward with recommendations centered on inclusive voice and advocacy to ensure the voices of the engineering education practitioners and other experts in the Alliance are amplified and de-siloed. The first step is to form a working group guiding the implementation of the GEAR model to focus on equity. Additionally, the work within this Alliance will provide a guide for other multi-institutional collaborations that focus on equity within the engineering field.

Citation
Format

Zarch, R., & McGill, M. (2023, June), Centering equity in an NSF engineering education alliance: Considerations for complex, multi stakeholder work Paper presented at 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore , Maryland. 10.18260/1-2--43147

TY - CPAPER
AB - Problem: Increasing the graduation rates of BIPOC+ and women in the engineering field is at the core of this multi-institutional Alliance. The work described in this piece of a larger project centers on an equity-lens for both internal and external collaborative work with the common goal of diversifying the engineering field.

Research Questions: There are two research questions. 1) How is equity understood and centered in the work of the Alliance from the perspective of the collaborators? 2) How do well established professionals, who have been working in the engineering field for decades, think outside the box to implement new best and promising practices for recruiting, retaining and graduating BIPOC and women engineering students?

Methodology: In this qualitative study, we used the framework known as the GEAR Model (Getting Equity Advocacy Results) to develop semi-structured interview questions for collaborators within a multi-institutional Alliance. In total we completed 15 interviews, which were recorded and transcribed for coding purposes.The interviews were transcribed using the “Gold Standard,” which is an approach where one member of the research team codes all of the narratives in the data set, setting the standard. A second member of the research team serves as the reliability coder. The reliability coder codes a subset of the total data set, but that person’s coding is used only to establish interrater reliability with the master coder; it is the coding of the master coder that is used in the final analysis. The proportion coded by the reliability coder will depend on the size and complexity of the data set, but a common figure is 20% of the total data set (e.g., Lilgendahl &amp;amp; McAdams, 2011; McLean &amp;amp; Pratt, 2006).

Findings: Several common themes emerged from coded interviews. The themes that were found include a lack of common voice and knowledge, top-down decision making, lack of organization resulting in slow movement, communition, and the focus on equity as an overarching goal, but lack in the internal workings of the Alliance.

Implications: Based on this research, the Alliance is moving forward with recommendations centered on inclusive voice and advocacy to ensure the voices of the engineering education practitioners and other experts in the Alliance are amplified and de-siloed. The first step is to form a working group guiding the implementation of the GEAR model to focus on equity. Additionally, the work within this Alliance will provide a guide for other multi-institutional collaborations that focus on equity within the engineering field.
AU - Rebecca Zarch
AU - Monica McGill
CY - Baltimore , Maryland
DA - 2023/06/25
PB - ASEE Conferences
TI - Centering equity in an NSF engineering education alliance: Considerations for complex, multi stakeholder work
UR - https://peer.asee.org/43147
DO - 10.18260/1-2--43147
ER -

Centering equity in an NSF engineering education alliance: Considerations for complex, multi stakeholder work

Paper Authors

Rebecca Zarch SageFox Consulting Group orcid.org/0000-0002-3980-5848

Monica McGill CSEdResearch.org orcid.org/0000-0002-3096-9619

Abstract

Citation

APA

APA - LaTeX bibitem

MLA

MLA - LaTeX bibitem

Bibtex

EndNote - RIS