Characteristics and Discourses about Energy Transition: Insights from Crossdisciplinary Student Talk

Desen Sevi Özkan; Todd Campbell; Pamela C Detrois

Download Paper | Permalink

Conference: 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Publication Date: June 22, 2025
Start Date: June 22, 2025
End Date: August 15, 2025
Conference Session: Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES) Technical Session 1: Critical Reflections on Teaching and Learning
Tagged Division: Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)
Tagged Topic: Diversity
Page Count: 20
Permanent URL: https://peer.asee.org/56081

Paper Authors

biography

Desen Sevi Özkan University of Connecticut orcid.org/0000-0002-1996-7719

visit author page

Desen is an assistant professor at the University of Connecticut in the Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering Department. She holds a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. Her research focuses on sociotechnical engineering education and how people make sense of complex sociotechnical energy infrastructure and systems.

visit author page

biography

Todd Campbell University of Connecticut

visit author page

Todd Campbell is a Professor and Head of the Department of Curriculum and Instruction at the University of Connecticut.

visit author page

author page

Pamela C Detrois University of Connecticut

Download Paper | Permalink

Abstract

Discourses of energy and energy transition have become increasingly prevalent in informal and formal learning spaces. Energy transitions differ across regions, contexts, and technologies. The contextual nature of energy is an opportunity for a sociotechnical approach to its study. Energy transition is not one big change effort but instead is made up of countless decision points negotiated by and through geography, technology, culture, and people. In this study, we examine the different discourses that engineering and liberal arts students engage in as they think about questions in energy transitions. This crossdisciplinary sample of students offers insight into the plurality through which people from different disciplines and backgrounds characterize issues of sustainable energy transition. Through this research, we examined how students think through and characterize issues of energy transition. We situated this study in a cross-disciplinary undergraduate course on sustainable energies, co-taught by two faculty members, one in political science and one in mechanical engineering. The study consists of semi-structured student interviews following the course’s completion. We interviewed ten students across majors and backgrounds on topics of energy transition and their impressions of local and global engagements in the space of sustainable energy.

Through latent coding, we discerned four overarching themes. The first theme consists of students grappling with or recognizing contradictory systems. The second theme, while similar to the first, focuses more explicitly on economics, as students describe the complex entanglements of energy, technology, and free market capitalist paradigms. The third comprises social/technical dualisms in which students discussed energy concepts and contexts through a lens of disciplinary duality in knowledge formations and in reference to their disciplinary identities. Lastly, students’ discourses included paradigms around techno-solutionism, where they reference or complicate the need for more innovation and technology for successful energy transitions. Within these themes, there are nuances in the different logics that underlie student thinking. In this paper, we surface students’ different ideological frames in a sustainable energy course with a predominantly homogenous sample of students. Through this study, we attend to the situated lived and learned experiences of students, which reveal insights into the ways people come to access different positions of learning, questioning, and decision-making in relation to their considerations about the many possibilities that constitute energy transitions. These insights are critical to attend to as the students recognize and hold competing insights around sustainable energy transition much like discourses in real-world energy transitions (Sovacool & Dworkin, 2016).

Citation
Format

Özkan, D. S., & Campbell, T., & Detrois, P. C. (2025, June), Characteristics and Discourses about Energy Transition: Insights from Crossdisciplinary Student Talk Paper presented at 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Montreal, Quebec, Canada . https://peer.asee.org/56081

TY - CPAPER
AB - Discourses of energy and energy transition have become increasingly prevalent in informal and formal learning spaces. Energy transitions differ across regions, contexts, and technologies. The contextual nature of energy is an opportunity for a sociotechnical approach to its study. Energy transition is not one big change effort but instead is made up of countless decision points negotiated by and through geography, technology, culture, and people. In this study, we examine the different discourses that engineering and liberal arts students engage in as they think about questions in energy transitions. This crossdisciplinary sample of students offers insight into the plurality through which people from different disciplines and backgrounds characterize issues of sustainable energy transition. Through this research, we examined how students think through and characterize issues of energy transition. We situated this study in a cross-disciplinary undergraduate course on sustainable energies, co-taught by two faculty members, one in political science and one in mechanical engineering. The study consists of semi-structured student interviews following the course’s completion. We interviewed ten students across majors and backgrounds on topics of energy transition and their impressions of local and global engagements in the space of sustainable energy.

Through latent coding, we discerned four overarching themes. The first theme consists of students grappling with or recognizing contradictory systems. The second theme, while similar to the first, focuses more explicitly on economics, as students describe the complex entanglements of energy, technology, and free market capitalist paradigms. The third comprises social/technical dualisms in which students discussed energy concepts and contexts through a lens of disciplinary duality in knowledge formations and in reference to their disciplinary identities. Lastly, students’ discourses included paradigms around techno-solutionism, where they reference or complicate the need for more innovation and technology for successful energy transitions. Within these themes, there are nuances in the different logics that underlie student thinking. In this paper, we surface students’ different ideological frames in a sustainable energy course with a predominantly homogenous sample of students. Through this study, we attend to the situated lived and learned experiences of students, which reveal insights into the ways people come to access different positions of learning, questioning, and decision-making in relation to their considerations about the many possibilities that constitute energy transitions. These insights are critical to attend to as the students recognize and hold competing insights around sustainable energy transition much like discourses in real-world energy transitions (Sovacool &amp;amp; Dworkin, 2016).

AU - Desen Sevi Özkan
AU - Todd Campbell
AU - Pamela C Detrois
CY - Montreal, Quebec, Canada
DA - 2025/06/22
PB - ASEE Conferences
TI - Characteristics and Discourses about Energy Transition: Insights from Crossdisciplinary Student Talk
UR - https://peer.asee.org/56081
ER -