Asee peer logo

Circuit Elements Are People Too—Using Personification In Circuit Analysis Lectures To Improve Comprehension

Download Paper |

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Publication Date

June 22, 2008

Start Date

June 22, 2008

End Date

June 25, 2008

ISSN

2153-5965

Conference Session

ECE Poster Session

Tagged Division

Electrical and Computer

Page Count

9

Page Numbers

13.293.1 - 13.293.9

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/4331

Download Count

52

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

L. Brent Jenkins

visit author page

Brent Jenkins is an Associate Professor in the Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology department at Southern Polytechnic State University. He has taught circuit analysis (and other topics) for over 13 years.

visit author page

Download Paper |

Abstract
NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

Circuit Elements are People Too—Using Personification in Circuit Analysis Lectures to Improve Comprehension

Abstract

An intuitive knowledge of circuit analysis is critical to the success of students in the electrical field. It is regrettable that the typical sophomore becomes so overwhelmed by the abstract aspects of the subject that he/she loses sight of its intuitive nature.

A lecture technique is available that employs the personification of circuit elements to describe their behavior and interaction. Not only does this technique help to retain student interest, it also improves comprehension. A related technique is available to help reduce the occurrence of sign errors when performing mesh analysis. This paper describes the application of these techniques in an introductory circuit analysis course. "The voltage across my terminals Source Behavior 12 V must be 12V."

Ideal sources, whether theoretical entities or models for actual components, are selfish devices (a) that leave no provision for compromise. The ideal voltage source in Figure 1a “insists” that the voltage across its terminals is 12 V. More specifically, this source insists that the voltage at "The current in its positive terminal is 12 V higher than the my branch must be voltage at its negative terminal. Likewise, the m 10 mA." ideal current source in Figure 1b insists that the current in its branch is 10 mA. Such perspectives provide useful intuition about circuit behavior in general, but they are especially useful when (b) discussing source combination or source neutralization. Figure 1: Ideal Source Behavior

Source Combination

The selfish nature of ideal sources provides a memorable explanation about why it is m impossible to combine non-identical ideal 2V 3V voltage sources in parallel or non-identical ideal current sources in series. In Figure 2a, the left m source insists that the terminal voltage of the "We refuse to circuit is 2V, while the right source insists that compromise." the same voltage is 3V. In Figure 2b, the upper (a) (b) source insists that the branch current is 10 mA, while the lower source insists that the same Figure 2: Impossible Source Combinations

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2008 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015