Salt Lake City, Utah
June 20, 2004
June 20, 2004
June 23, 2004
9.308.1 - 9.308.6
Session Number: 1461
Classic Rhetorical Pedagogy as a Model for Interdisciplinary Design/Engineering Instruction.
Richard Fry IDSA/ITEA Assistant Professor, Industrial Design Program School of Technology Brigham Young University
Engineering, Industrial Design, and Business are three disciplines that work together in the world of product development. Power struggles exist over who is most important. Because of these struggles, ultimate success is often difficult to achieve. These struggles exist because of a general lack of understanding between each of the disciplines about how they relate to one another in a larger picture.
In the spirit of interdisciplinary product development, students in the College of Engineering and Technology at Brigham Young University participate in a “Capstone” experience that is meant to expose them to the comparative peculiarities of the three disciplines of Manufacturing, Engineering, and Industrial Design. Despite the success of various individual team projects, a general dissatisfaction exists in the ranks of the students about what the actual benefit is for all their collaborative effort.
Interdisciplinary Product Development efforts (both in and outside of industry) suffer from one sided biases based on the discipline of the sponsoring body. Engineering based programs neglect Business, Manufacturing, and Industrial Design. Business based programs neglect the needs Engineering and Manufacturing programs.
Successful product development teams realize that true success and innovation comes from the overlapping of the disciplines where they rely on each other for their individual strengths. This is the overlapping sweet spot - the “Nexus of Product Development.” (Figure 1)
However, most of the time, each discipline struggles to put for the argument that: 1. Their discipline carries the biggest burden 2. Their discipline addresses the issues that are most important to the consumer What is missing is a larger framework of understanding to show the interdependence of the three disciplines for success.
This paper will suggest how an understanding of classic rhetoric could provide the unifying framework for bringing together the disparate disciplines of Engineering, Industrial Design, and
Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education
Fry, R. (2004, June), Classic Rhetorical Pedagogy As A Model For Interdisciplinary Design/Engineering Instruction Paper presented at 2004 Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah. https://peer.asee.org/14075
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2004 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015