New Orleans, Louisiana
June 26, 2016
June 26, 2016
August 28, 2016
Educational Research and Methods
Classifying Dissatisfaction: Student Perspectives on Teammate Performance
This research paper aims to shed light on the behavior and motivations of students who fail to effectively contribute to group success on engineering student project teams. Though it is common for educators to require (or at least expect) students to participate equally on team projects, students may contribute differently in terms of both degree and in the way in which they participate. Accordingly, student perceptions of acceptable or negative teaming behaviors by peers may differ from faculty expectations.
In this study, we investigated the experiences of students in engineering project courses at a large public university. The data used for this analysis was a subset of that collected for a larger project on task choice and self-efficacy, which used a mixed-methods concurrent triangulation approach. Semi-structured interviews at the end of each course were used to probe the teaming experience of participants. This included, for example, asking interviewees to describe their team members and what roles each played, or to describe an occasion where the team faced a challenge. The interviews were analyzed to investigate the ways in which students spoke negatively about their teammates. Negative comments in response to interview questions were identified, excerpted from the full interviews, and subjected to qualitative analysis.
Eleven categories of negative behavior emerged from the responses from interviewees. A taxonomy of the ways in which students express their dissatisfaction with teammate performance was developed. Rooted in self-determination theory, which is concerned with the level to which individuals are self-motivated, these categories formed a continuum. It ranged from total inactivity (“checking out”) to active engagement in the project in a way that had negative effects on others (for example, redoing the work of teammates). Students on the disengaged and inactive side of the spectrum can be characterized by amotivation. On the other end of the continuum, students actively inhibiting the project’s progression may be displaying external motivation, which is often associated with mistrust of others and a fear of failure. This type of negative behavior, characterized by being deeply engaged but in a way that negatively affects teammates, is not captured well by conventional peer assessments that focus on the affirmative development of teaming skills. A better understanding of negative behavioral components and of negative team experiences, particularly using a framework focused on motivation, may allow for improved design of team-based project experiences and improved mentoring of project teams.
Miller, E., & Hirshfield, L., & Chachra, D. (2016, June), Classifying Dissatisfaction: Student Perspectives on Teammate Performance Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana. 10.18260/p.26499
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2016 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015