Asee peer logo

Classroom Climate Analysis of Flipped Structural Classrooms with Active Learning: A Case Study

Download Paper |

Conference

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Baltimore , Maryland

Publication Date

June 25, 2023

Start Date

June 25, 2023

End Date

June 28, 2023

Conference Session

Committee on Effective Teaching Presents: Teaching Mode Active-ated

Tagged Division

Civil Engineering Division (CIVIL)

Page Count

16

DOI

10.18260/1-2--43205

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/43205

Download Count

205

Paper Authors

biography

Ryan L Solnosky, P.E. Pennsylvania State University Orcid 16x16 orcid.org/0000-0002-5214-2102

visit author page

Ryan Solnosky is an Associate Teaching Professor in the Department of Architectural Engineering at The Pennsylvania State University at University Park. Dr. Solnosky has taught courses for Architectural Engineering, Civil Engineering, and Pre-Major Freshmen. He is the recipient of several teaching awards both within Penn State and Nationally. Ryan's research centers on technology for teaching, capstones, and active learning in design classes.

visit author page

author page

Thomas Gonzalez O'Halloran

Download Paper |

Abstract

From passive instruction to highly collaborative active learning, student success can vary in the classroom based on a variety of factors. Within different possible learning constructs, how the class environment, or climate, is structured can make a significant impact on a student being successful. When developing or adopting new classroom pedagogical approaches, both faculty and student perspectives need to be considered and understood better. To better understand the impact of varying levels of active learning from the student perspective, this research looked at the classroom environment by assessing it with the established College and University Classroom Environment Inventory (CUCEI). The focus of this project in this paper centers on a single instructor that has varied the active learning techniques across a steel design class and a computer modeling class. To see if, and to what extent, active learning made climate improvements, data from before and after active learning adoption were compared. The CUCEI compares these climates on seven psychosocial dimensions of classroom: personalization, involvement, student cohesiveness, satisfaction, task orientation, innovation, and individualization. This paper explore how climate changes between traditional and active delivery, does the quantity of active learning change the climate, and lastly, is there a relationship between climate and student achievement.

Results from the data has shown that climate perspectives do not necessarily increase or could possibly decrease when active learning is deployed. While much of the data was inclusive due to sample sizes and a lack of statistical evidence, there were still several observed trends that provides rich insights. First, the steel course has some unique instances compared to the modeling class. For the steel design class 4 psychosocial dimensions can predict grades while for computer modeling only 2 predict data. Within steel design the most important climate characteristics for success is students enjoy going class and know exactly what has to be done and they let students decide some of the metrics. At the same time instructor’s need to be interested in students' problems while giving. For computer modeling this shifts to the level of instructor support to help in class and give ample opportunity to pursue interests.

Solnosky,, R. L., & O'Halloran, T. G. (2023, June), Classroom Climate Analysis of Flipped Structural Classrooms with Active Learning: A Case Study Paper presented at 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore , Maryland. 10.18260/1-2--43205

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2023 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015