Asee peer logo

Closing The Assessment Feedback Loop: The Use Of A Qualitative Evaluation Process From The Joint Hybrid Electric Vehicle/Nsf Penn State Science Education Project

Download Paper |

Conference

2005 Annual Conference

Location

Portland, Oregon

Publication Date

June 12, 2005

Start Date

June 12, 2005

End Date

June 15, 2005

ISSN

2153-5965

Conference Session

College Engineering K-12 Outreach III

Page Count

14

Page Numbers

10.310.1 - 10.310.14

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/14411

Download Count

8

Request a correction

Paper Authors

author page

William Carlsen

author page

Robin Tallon

author page

Phil Henning

author page

Nicola Ferralis

author page

Leanne Avery

author page

Daniel Haworth

author page

Elana Chapman

Download Paper |

Abstract
NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

2005-1410 Closing the Assessment Feedback Loop: The Use of A Qualitative Evaluation Process from the Joint Hybrid-Electric Vehicle/NSF-Penn State Science Education Project

Elana Chapman /Pennsylvania State University, Nicola Ferralis /Pennsylvania State University, Robin Tallon /Pennsylvania State University, Leanne Avery /Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Phil Henning /The Henning Group, LLC., William Carlsen /Pennsylvania State University, Daniel Haworth /Pennsylvania State University

Abstract

Penn State University has hosted a NSF sponsored GK-12 Outreach project for the past five years, and has just begun the second phase of the project. The Penn State project utilizes the talents of many science and engineering graduate students as teachers, mentors and role models for the K-12 classrooms. The project focuses on developing skills of students in the areas of science, technology, engineering and mathematics through the use of Advanced Transportation Technologies. The GK-12 students are invited to participate in research in various ways in support of Advanced Transportation Technology such as undergraduate/graduate student competitions like Future Truck and Challenge X. The quantitative assessment planned at the onset of the project proved inadequate. Therefore, as the project progressed, a more qualitative approach was used to gather information about the attitudes of students with regard to science. As the project progressed, qualitative assessment was used to gather feedback from GK-12 teachers and students as to the value of the efforts, and served as a supportive feedback mechanism to the graduate students. This paper will review the assessment tools used in this project, and will present the data collected for the phase I and phase II of the project.

Introduction

The Penn State GK-12 National Science Foundation (NSF)-funded Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) outreach project to middle and high schools in northeast and central Pennsylvania has unfolded in two phases. The first phase, M3 (Motivation, Mentoring, and Manipulatives) Hybrid-Electric Vehicle Educational Highway, was funded for four years. The ongoing second phase is commonly referred to as the NSF GREATT project, whose full title is, Track 2, NSF GK-12: Graduate Research and

Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education

Carlsen, W., & Tallon, R., & Henning, P., & Ferralis, N., & Avery, L., & Haworth, D., & Chapman, E. (2005, June), Closing The Assessment Feedback Loop: The Use Of A Qualitative Evaluation Process From The Joint Hybrid Electric Vehicle/Nsf Penn State Science Education Project Paper presented at 2005 Annual Conference, Portland, Oregon. https://peer.asee.org/14411

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2005 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015