Asee peer logo

Communications Strategies to Increase Recruitment of Women to Engineering

Download Paper |

Conference

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

San Antonio, Texas

Publication Date

June 10, 2012

Start Date

June 10, 2012

End Date

June 13, 2012

ISSN

2153-5965

Conference Session

Undergraduate Recruitment

Tagged Division

Women in Engineering

Page Count

10

Page Numbers

25.327.1 - 25.327.10

DOI

10.18260/1-2--21085

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/21085

Download Count

329

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Sandra Woods Colorado State University

visit author page

Sandra Woods has served as Dean of the College of Engineering at Colorado State University since 2005. She received her B.S. in civil engineering from Michigan State University and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in civil engineering from the University of Washington.

visit author page

biography

Kathleen Baumgardner Colorado State University

visit author page

Kathleen Baumgardner is the Director of Strategic Communications for the College of Engineering at Colorado State University. The communications unit is charged with developing strategic messaging for specific audiences via web, print, and social media, as well as one-on-one recruitment contacts.

visit author page

biography

Lahoma Jayne Howard Colorado State University

visit author page

Graduate student, Department of Sociology

visit author page

Download Paper |

Abstract

Communications Strategies to Increase Recruitment of Women to Engineering Authors: Kathleen Baumgardner and Sandra Woods College of Engineering Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado 80526 Sandra.Woods@colostate.eduSix years ago, the College of Engineering at Colorado State launched a program to attractwomen to its undergraduate engineering programs. The initiative included extensive surveying,reworking the College website, a communications plan that included gender-segmentedcommunications, and a student ambassador program focused on quality contacts withprospective female students.The goal was simple – increase the number of women in our engineering programs. In Fall 2006,we had 218 female students, 15.8% of our undergraduate enrollments. The number of incomingwomen freshman had remained flat for several years – about 50 women. At the time, theAmerican Society for Engineering Education reported that women represented 17.5% of allundergraduate engineering enrollments in the U.S. (ASEE, 2006), putting us below the nationalaverage.We modified our communications with female students based on information obtained fromthree surveys: freshman, midpoint, and senior. These surveys, which we continue to use, armedus with information that we used to modify our communications with students. We segmentedprint communications, developing separate communications for male and female students.Letters to women focused on key factors such as academic quality, engineering as a meaningfulprofession, our friendly campus, and possibilities for graduate study. In 2010, we segmentedcommunications further by in-state and out-of-state residency and academic interest areas. Werewrote and redesigned the College’s website based on our research, incorporating language andimages that targeted women directly.The College of Engineering also created a College Ambassador Program. These students provideone-on-one college tours, write personalized letters and e-mails responding to questions, sit onstudent panels for visit events, and phone prospective students. The majority of our ambassadorsare females. We try to connect every prospective female student with a current female student.We also use Facebook extensively to communicate with prospective students. Typically a largerpercentage of women join our Facebook page than the percentage of women in our admittedstudent pool, making this an attractive communication tool.The program has been very successful. In six years we have seen our undergraduate enrollmentgrow from 1,378 to 1,866 (35.4% increase). The fraction of female undergraduate students hasincreased substantially (15.8% to 19.8%), bringing us above the most recent national average.iNumbers of incoming freshmen women have more than doubled, with about 50 women enteringin fall 2006 compared to 122 women (22.2%) entering the engineering program in fall 2011.i ASEE reported that women represented 18.2% of undergraduate engineering enrollments in the U.S. (ASEE,2010) up from 17.5% (ASEE, 2006).

Woods, S., & Baumgardner, K., & Howard, L. J. (2012, June), Communications Strategies to Increase Recruitment of Women to Engineering Paper presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas. 10.18260/1-2--21085

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2012 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015