Asee peer logo

Comparative Analysis of Technologies Used in Responsive Building Facades

Download Paper |

Conference

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Columbus, Ohio

Publication Date

June 24, 2017

Start Date

June 24, 2017

End Date

June 28, 2017

Conference Session

Architectural Division Technical Session 1

Tagged Division

Architectural

Tagged Topic

Diversity

Page Count

29

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/28052

Download Count

749

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Negar Heidari Matin Eastern Michigan University

visit author page

Negar Matin is currently a Ph.D. candidate in Technology at Eastern Michigan University (EMU), Ypsilanti, Michigan. Ms. Matin received her Master’s Degree in architecture from Tabriz Art University, Tabriz, Iran. She has been a doctoral fellow working on responsive façade systems since 2015. Her research interests are in interdisciplinary areas of cultural identities, architectural technology, building envelopes, responsive autonomous intelligent façade systems and smart materials. Ms. Matin has over 3 years of experience of teaching in architecture and interior design field at Azad Islamic University and Eastern Michigan University. She has been LEED Green Associate since 2016.

visit author page

biography

Ali Eydgahi Eastern Michigan University

visit author page

Ali Eydgahi started his career in higher education as a faculty member at the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in 1985. Since then, he has been with the State University of New York, University of Maryland Eastern Shore, and Eastern Michigan University. During 2006-2010, he was Chair of the Department of Engineering and Aviation Sciences, Founder and Director of the Center for 3-D Visualization and Virtual Reality Applications, and Technical Director of the NASA funded MIST Space Vehicle Mission Planning Laboratory at the University of Maryland Eastern Shore. In 2010, he joined Eastern Michigan University as an Associate Dean in the College of Technology and currently is a Professor in the School of Engineering Technology. He has an extensive experience in curriculum and laboratory design and development. Dr. Eydgahi has served as a member of the Board of Directors for Tau Alpha Pi, as a member of Advisory and Editorial boards for many International Journals in Engineering and Technology, as a member of review panel for NASA and Department of Education, as a regional and chapter chairman of IEEE, SME, and ASEE, and as a session chair and as a member of scientific and international committees for many international conferences.

visit author page

author page

Shinming Shyu Eastern Michigan University

Download Paper |

Abstract

Multiple factors initiated the idea of active facades in the 1960s. These factors stem from revolutionary changes in public culture, economy, technology and their impacts on architecture. The energy crisis over the decade and depletion of natural resources caused the increasing cost of fossil fuel energy as well as the growing public awareness towards crucial environmental problems such as public green/public sustainable culture and the popularity of sustainable strategic planning. On the other hand, these changes paralleled advancements in technology such as electrical control systems, computer engineering and information technology, artificial intelligence and cybernetics as well as material science.

These dramatic and comprehensive changes in culture, economy, society and technology have urged architects to propose new theories of design. Cybernetic theory of architecture was one of these theories that proposed to design dynamic architecture rather than static entities. These dynamic entities in architecture and its components offer close interactions between human and environment. Buildings as one of the main consumer of fossil fuel energies with a high consumption rate of 40% per year in the United States, have been considered for sustainable strategies for energy consumption. Building envelope, as represented by relationship of interior and exterior of a building, interacts with both natural environment and building users. This interaction is responsible for more than 85% of annual heat lost in a traditional building façade. Moreover, characteristics of a traditional static façade limit energy performance in various seasonal conditions. The traditional façade limitations, which affect static façade energy performance consist of high rate of heat transmission, high rate of solar heat gain and high rate of air exchange. Furthermore, daylight and visual performance of a static façade could be improved by reducing window glare discomfort effect, decreasing high energy demand for artificial lighting, providing self-shading façade, and optimizing internal natural daylight levels.

To overcome the limitations of existing traditional façades, the idea of an active façade as a systematically adapted entity has been proposed to exploit potential benefits of new technology in the design of a multifunctional and integrated façade system. An active facade can manage internal environments by modifying characteristics of a façade dynamically as well as controlling external environmental parameters. Studies have shown that these modifications can improve the performance of the active façade by 16 to 18% in comparison with the static facades.

In 1962, advancement in technology enabled designers to create new responsive facades that have direct impact on performance and appearance of buildings. However, there is no clear classification about types of technology used in responsive façade designs.

In this paper, the historical evolution of implemented technology in responsive façade is presented. By analyzing existing cases of facades, five main categories of implemented technology have been developed. These classifications are differentiated based on the types of sensors, actuators and control systems that are utilized. The five categories include electro-mechanical technology, information technology, advanced material technology, green technology and integrated technology. Furthermore, comparisons of these technologies and their benefits/shortcomings are discussed. Finally, an efficient integrated model is proposed, which implements positive characteristics of previous technologies.

Heidari Matin, N., & Eydgahi, A., & Shyu, S. (2017, June), Comparative Analysis of Technologies Used in Responsive Building Facades Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. https://peer.asee.org/28052

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2017 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015