San Antonio, Texas
June 10, 2012
June 10, 2012
June 13, 2012
25.331.1 - 25.331.9
Comparing First-Year Engineering Technology Persisters and Non- Persisters. Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) Education is a growing nationalpriority. “Reaffirming and strengthening America’s role as the world’s engine ofscientific discovery and technological innovation is essential to meeting the challenges ofthis century,” said President Obama. (The White House Office of the Press Secretary,http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/president-obama-launches-educate-innovate-campaign-excellence-science-technology-en). The School of Engineering andTechnology at a large midwestern urban university is committed to the advancement ofSTEM education. Over one-third of graduates in the School of Engineering andTechnology are from the Engineering Technology department. Improvement inengineering technology student retention plays a vital role in campus STEM graduationproduction. Between 2008 and 2010, less than 52% of students who start the programremain after their first year. (B. Christe, personal communication, October 5, 2011).There is not much known on the specific factors that contribute to the gradual loss ofengineering technology majors after their first year in the program. Little research hasbeen generated on improving engineering technology student retention.The purpose of the study is to examine what differences exist between first yearengineering technology majors who continue in the major and those who leave or aredismissed prior to the beginning of the second year. Analyzing the data collected such asmath courses taken previously, specific major, and method of admission will helpdevelop a description of a persisters and non-persisters. The data consists of three sets offull-time freshman engineering technology majors. One group enrolled in the fall of2008 (75 students), the second group enrolled in the fall of 2009 (86 students) and thethird group enrolled in the fall of 2010 (69 students. Understanding the key differenceswill guide faculty in creating possible intervention opportunities in the effort to increaseretention.
Wagner, M. J., & Christe, B. L., & Fernandez, E. (2012, June), Comparing First-year Engineering Technology Persisters and Non-persisters Paper presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas. 10.18260/1-2--21089
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2012 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015