Kauffmann, P. J., & Wilck, J., & Lynch, P. C. (2015, June), Comparison of Engineering Economics Learning Outcomes and Student Perception   Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.23717

\bibitem{asee_peer_23717}
  Kauffmann, P. J., \& Wilck, J., \& Lynch, P. C. (2015, June), \emph{Comparison of Engineering Economics Learning Outcomes and Student Perception }
  Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition, Seattle, Washington.
  10.18260/p.23717

Paul J. Kauffmann P.E., Joseph Wilck, and Paul C. Lynch.  "Comparison of Engineering Economics Learning Outcomes and Student Perception ".  2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington, 2015, June.  ASEE Conferences, 2015.  https://peer.asee.org/23717 Internet.  23 Apr, 2024

\bibitem{asee_peer_23717}
  Paul J. Kauffmann P.E., Joseph Wilck, and Paul C. Lynch.
  "Comparison of Engineering Economics Learning Outcomes and Student Perception ".
  \emph{2015 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition, Seattle, Washington, 2015, June}.
  ASEE Conferences, 2015.
  https://peer.asee.org/23717 Internet.  23 Apr, 2024

@INPROCEEDINGS{asee_peer_23717
author = "Paul J. Kauffmann P.E., Joseph Wilck, and Paul C. Lynch"
title = "Comparison of Engineering Economics Learning Outcomes and Student Perception "
booktitle = "2015 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition"
year = "2015"
month = "June"
address = "Seattle, Washington"
publisher = "ASEE Conferences"
note = {https://peer.asee.org/23717}
number = {10.18260/p.23717}
}

TY  - CPAPER
AB  -     Comparison of Engineering Economics Learning Outcomes Using Live               Distance and Face to Face Delivery MethodsA continuing trend in engineering education is increasing use of distance or on line deliveredinstructional materials. There is a growing body of literature which examines various aspects ofon line versus traditional instructional methods but the study of engineering classes deliveredlive using different modalities is not well studied. This paper adds to this literature by examiningthe effectiveness of two parallel course delivery techniques in accomplishing student learning:live face to face lectures compared to live distance delivered lectures. Three sections ofengineering economics with three different instructors (two face to face and one distancedelivered) participated in the study. All three sections used consistent final exam questions andevaluated learning outcomes using consistent rubrics. The paper will analyze similarities anddifferences in student accomplishment based on these final exam questions and student responsesto related survey questions. In addition, the distance delivered lectures employed a responsesystem which enabled quizzes and attendance monitoring very similar to a face to face courseusing clicker technology. Results of this new innovation will also be analyzed in the paper.This study will be of interest to engineering educators and in particular those who are exploringor investigating various distance learning approaches.
AU  - Paul J. Kauffmann P.E.
AU  - Joseph Wilck
AU  - Paul C. Lynch
CY  - Seattle, Washington
DA  - 2015/06/14
PB  - ASEE Conferences
TI  - Comparison of Engineering Economics Learning Outcomes and Student Perception 
UR  - https://peer.asee.org/23717
DO  - 10.18260/p.23717
ER  -