Asee peer logo

Comparison of Online Versus Paper Spatial Testing Methods

Download Paper |

Conference

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Seattle, Washington

Publication Date

June 14, 2015

Start Date

June 14, 2015

End Date

June 17, 2015

ISBN

978-0-692-50180-1

ISSN

2153-5965

Conference Session

Visualization Within Engineering Design Graphics Education Session 1

Tagged Division

Engineering Design Graphics

Tagged Topic

Diversity

Page Count

11

Page Numbers

26.381.1 - 26.381.11

DOI

10.18260/p.23720

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/23720

Download Count

100

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Norma L Veurink Michigan Technological University

visit author page

Norma Veurink is a Senior Lecturer in the Engineering Fundamentals Department at Michigan Technological University where she teaches introductory engineering courses and a spatial visualization course designed for engineering students with poorly developed spatial visualization skills. Ms. Veurink manages several summer programs that introduce middle and high school students to engineering. She is active in the Engineering Design Graphics Division of ASEE.

visit author page

biography

A. J. Hamlin Michigan Technological University

visit author page

AJ Hamlin is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at Michigan Technological University, where she teaches first-year engineering courses. Her research interests include engineering ethics, spatial visualization, and educational methods. She is an active member in the Engineering Design Graphics Division of ASEE and is currently serving as the Associate Editor of the Engineering Design Graphics Journal.

visit author page

Download Paper |

Abstract

Comparison of On‐line versus Paper Spatial Testing Methods Spatial visualization skills have been shown to be critical to the success of engineers and engineering students, and the assessment and remediation of those skills is growing in engineering curricula across the country.  At ______ University, spatial skills of freshmen engineering students have been tested with the use of the Purdue Spatial Visualization Test:  Rotations (PSVT:R) since 1993.  This test has traditionally been administered with paper tests where students record their answers on a scantron form.  Due to changes in university computing resources in the 2013‐2014 academic year, the opportunity arose to test the freshmen through a Learning Management System (LMS).  In the fall of 2014, over 450 of the engineering freshmen were administered the PSVT:R with the traditional paper test method, while approximately the same number took the test through the LMS.   Testing half of the students with each method allowed for a comparison to be made between the two testing methods.  Although students are told not to make marks on the paper version of the test, several students do so.  Testing students on‐line removes this opportunity to make marks and may also reduce students’ use of other tactile motions in solving the rotational problems.  This paper will compare scores from the paper version of the test with scores on the on‐line version of the test to determine if students perform equally on the on‐line and paper forms of the test.  Because spatial test scores are related to intelligence, Math ACT scores of the two groups will be compared to determine if there are differences between the two groups.  These analyses will also be performed by gender and ethnicity. 

Veurink, N. L., & Hamlin, A. J. (2015, June), Comparison of Online Versus Paper Spatial Testing Methods Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.23720

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2015 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015