Asee peer logo

Comparison of Teamwork Assessment Methods in Engineering Classes

Download Paper |

Conference

2025 ASEE Southeast Conference

Location

Mississippi State University, Mississippi

Publication Date

March 9, 2025

Start Date

March 9, 2025

End Date

March 11, 2025

Conference Session

Professional Papers

Tagged Topic

Professional Papers

Page Count

10

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/54210

Download Count

2

Paper Authors

biography

Adam Barnes University of Virginia

visit author page

Adam Barnes graduated with a BS and MS in Electrical Engineering from Virginia Tech. He worked in small business and industry for 18 years before returning to Virginia Tech to teach engineering as a professor of practice. He then moved to Charlottesville and began teaching at the University of Virginia in the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, where he has now been for 5 years.

visit author page

Download Paper |

Abstract

The ability to work well in teams is consistently one of the most sought-after skills by employers, and so deserves serious attention in higher education courses. To evaluate the effectiveness of any program or module designed to teach teamwork requires a valid assessment tool. This is particularly important in engineering disciplines which must assess teamwork as part of their ABET accreditation. Because teamwork assessment is often subjective, it can be difficult to evaluate rigorously.

Teamwork assessment is often done with a survey of team members, ideally at multiple points during the project, although often it is only performed at the end. This is especially true of large classes, when the instructor cannot spend large amounts of time with each team, and for classes where teamwork occurs but is not the primary thrust of the class, as is the case in many engineering classes. The survey is relatively easy to implement, and there are a number of survey tools that streamline the process and make it applicable for a wide range of class sizes and subjects. However, the accuracy of the survey assessment by the students themselves can be problematic. First, many students don’t know what good teamwork really looks like; either they have not worked on a good team in the past or their team was not challenged to the point that the quality of the teamwork came into play. Second, students’ assessment of their peers may be too lenient, because they don’t want to hurt their teammates’ grade or feelings. Conversely it may be too harsh if the team members had a serious falling out or if one of the team members is prejudiced. But how often does this happen, and how much does it skew results? What is a reasonable threshold for success based on a team survey?

Fall semester 2024 I am teaching the Capstone Senior design course. Part of the project process is for each team to meet with the instructor on a weekly basis. This affords me the opportunity to regularly interact with each team which will allow me to assess team performance directly. In parallel, I will also be conducting teamwork surveys. This paper will compare the results and relative merits and limitations of each assessment method.

Barnes, A. (2025, March), Comparison of Teamwork Assessment Methods in Engineering Classes Paper presented at 2025 ASEE Southeast Conference , Mississippi State University, Mississippi. https://peer.asee.org/54210

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2025 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015