Asee peer logo

Competitive Polling to Enhance Engagement and Learning Outcomes in a Mechanical Engineering Classroom

Download Paper |

Conference

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Publication Date

June 22, 2025

Start Date

June 22, 2025

End Date

August 15, 2025

Conference Session

ME Division 12: Innovative Approaches to Thermodynamics

Tagged Division

Mechanical Engineering Division (MECH)

Tagged Topic

Diversity

Page Count

12

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/56129

Paper Authors

biography

Hongbo Nie University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

visit author page

Mr. Hongbo Nie is an undergraduate student in the Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. He is working with Professor Ke Tang on research of student-centered pedagogies.

visit author page

biography

Ke Tang University of Illinois Urbana - Champaign

visit author page

Ke Tang is a Teaching Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Dr. Tang's research focuses on engineering education, particularly on student-centered pedagogies, data-driven instruction, and interdisciplinary education.

visit author page

Download Paper |

Abstract

Engagement plays a crucial role in shaping students’ learning experiences and academic outcomes. This paper studies the impact of competitive polling on student engagement and learning outcomes in a traditional mechanical engineering course, Energy Conversion Systems. Polling has been increasingly used in higher education to promote active learning and increase participation, especially in a class with a large student enrollment. Modern tools, such as Mentimeter, Kahoot, Quizizz, etc., offer competitive polling that creates a gamified environment, fostering real-time student interaction and healthy competition among students. In this study, Mentimeter was used to conduct competitive polling in class. A mixed-methods approach was employed, incorporating a survey to assess student perceptions of in-class engagement during competitive polling activities, and semi-structured interviews to explore the effect on student interest, motivation, and learning outcomes. The survey data revealed that students experienced significantly higher levels of engagement when the competitive elements were introduced. The major ways in which competitive polling makes students feel engaged are competitive interaction, in-time feedback on the answers, ranking with peers, and leaderboard right after each polling question. The survey data also addressed whether the leaderboard of competitive polling caused any negative feelings. 93% of students did not feel upset with the leaderboard, 7% were neutral, and no students voted for the leaderboard makes them feel upset. Further analysis of the interview results will be presented in this paper to discuss the effect of competitive polling on student interest, motivation, and learning outcomes. Additionally, competitive polling was implemented as part of the classwork activities in this course. To encourage participation and motivate students to do their best on the polling questions, the classwork rubric was designed to award a full score of 5 points for participation, with an extra 1 point given to students who ranked in the top 50% of participants. The effectiveness of this rubric in fostering active participation and encouraging greater effort on the polling questions will also be discussed in this paper.

Nie, H., & Tang, K. (2025, June), Competitive Polling to Enhance Engagement and Learning Outcomes in a Mechanical Engineering Classroom Paper presented at 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Montreal, Quebec, Canada . https://peer.asee.org/56129

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2025 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015