June 12, 2005
June 12, 2005
June 15, 2005
10.337.1 - 10.337.27
Conceptions of the Engineering Design Process: An Expert Study of Advanced Practicing Professionals
Susan Mosborg, Robin Adams, Rebecca Kim, Cynthia J. Atman, Jennifer Turns, and Monica Cardella Center for Engineering Learning and Teaching, University of Washington
Abstract. Published models of the engineering design process are widely available and often illustrated for students with a block diagram showing design as sequential and iterative. Here we examine experts’ conceptions of the design process in relation to a model synthesized from several introductory engineering textbooks. How do experts’ conceptions compare? What might they see as alternative accounts? We present preliminary results from an investigation of practicing engineers (n=19) who were asked to think aloud while reading a description of this “textbook” model, as well as draw their idea of the engineering design process and choose descriptors of design. Only 3 participants were found to have a view in major disagreement with the model, yet 7 drew alternative types of diagrams, and the experts as a whole emphasized problem scoping and communication. We focus especially on the case of one engineer who commented extensively on communication, articulating a view of engineering design as open, multi-participant, and multidisciplinary, with implications for how to conceptualize expertise in engineering problem solving.
Engineering textbooks have traditionally introduced students to engineering design by way of a block diagram. Although these diagrams vary slightly from one textbook to the next, the iconic diagram encloses each stage of the process in a block and depicts flow through the stages using arrows, typically double-ended to signify iteration between phases. Figure 1 is one example of the linear depiction of the engineering design process popularized in textbooks over the last several decades (Dixon,1 as cited in Bucciarelli,2 p.93). The number of stages in these diagrams has ranged from a few to several dozen (see, for example, Woodson3), depending on the detail and complexity with which the design process is rendered. In a content analysis of seven introductory engineering design textbooks conducted in 1995, Atman and her colleagues4 synthesized the texts’ depictions into a six-step model: 1. Problem Definition, 2. Information Gathering, 3. Generation of Alternative Solutions, 4. Analysis/Evaluation, 5. Selection, and 6. Implementation/Communication.
“Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education”
Mosborg, S., & Adams, R., & Kim, R., & Cardella, M., & Atman, C., & Turns, J. (2005, June), Conceptions Of The Engineering Design Process: An Expert Study Of Advanced Practicing Professionals Paper presented at 2005 Annual Conference, Portland, Oregon. 10.18260/1-2--14999
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2005 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015