June 15, 2014
June 15, 2014
June 18, 2014
24.316.1 - 24.316.16
Construction Contract Language; a Growing Impediment to Trust and Cooperation Brian W. Loss J.D.Written documents that have come to be seen as standard agreements in the construction industry havebecome unnecessarily complicated and dominated by exculpatory and risk shifting clauses. As such, thesewritings often reflect a set of conditions, impossible for the layman to understand, that are imposed upon theweaker party by the stronger. This represents a disconnect in expectations between the two parties ratherthan a true meeting of the minds as required for actual contract formation. This type of writing tendered bythe stronger party, and usually accepted by the weaker, has been legitimized by custom and usage; it has beendone and so it becomes acceptable conduct. Consequently, aggressive contract language has becomeaccepted as common practice. This practice engenders an atmosphere of suspicion and distrust between thecontracting parties that is inconsistent with what has been the relational nature of the industry. This relationalcomponent of the construction industry has been its vitality valuing trust and cooperation over short termgain. It is after all the relational nature of the industry that facilitates cooperation in the decision makingprocess allowing contracting parties to deal with issues as they arise in a timely fashion thereby keeping costslower. The valuation of short term gain over mutually beneficial, long-term working relationships has beendetrimental to the industry driving up the cost of construction and driving many smaller but viable operationsfrom the field. This has had the effect of consolidating the industry around larger players who have theresources to retain legal counsel as a part of their overhead that is ultimately passed on to the customer.This article will examine contract language as it has evolved to establish purpose and its purported as opposedto its actual effect of that language. We will then document the trend in smaller operations, which lack theresources to retain counsel, leaving the industry and the deleterious anticompetitive effects of removing allbut the largest operations from the construction process. Finally, we will suggest common sense changes incontract language predicated upon trust and cooperation that will be beneficial to both parties and, by proxy,to those who are served by an industry animated by better purposes.
Loss, B. W. (2014, June), Construction Contract Language; a Growing Impediment to Trust and Cooperation Paper presented at 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana. 10.18260/1-2--20207
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2014 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015