Albuquerque, New Mexico
June 24, 2001
June 24, 2001
June 27, 2001
6.299.1 - 6.299.7
Consulting and Industrial Experiences as Related to Promotion and Tenure of Engineering Technology Faculty
Andrew T. Rose University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown
To successfully achieve the goal of tenure, a well thought out professional development plan is essential. For engineering technology (ET) faculty, the requirements of the ET tenure process may be well suited for utilizing consulting and industrial experiences as a portion of the professional development plan. Engineering technology programs are different from engineering programs in that they teach the use of current technology to solve engineering problems facing industry. Accreditation requirements for ET programs prescribe that faculty have a minimum amount of industrial experience prior to beginning their teaching career. In addition, ET faculty can maintain currency is through industrial experience and consulting. Industrial experience and consulting can provide opportunities for professional development, if the faculty member properly documents these experiences in the technical literature. Consulting and industrial experiences can present opportunities for professional publishing in the form of case histories presented in conference proceedings and journal articles of a practical nature. Documenting how consulting and industrial experiences were incorporated into the curriculum also presents opportunities for pedagogical publications. In addition, applied research opportunities may result from experience in industry. This paper explores how ET faculty can utilize consulting and industrial experiences as part of their professional development plan for promotion and tenure.
Promotion and tenure of engineering technology (ET) faculty requires evaluation of an individual’s proficiency in teaching, scholarship and service. The importance of each of these may vary from one institution to another. For a new ET faculty member, understanding what is expected at their institution in these three areas is important for putting together a strong plan leading to promotion and tenure.
An important difference between engineering and engineering technology programs regarding the use of consulting and industrial experiences as part of a promotion and tenure plan is worth noting. In engineering programs, consulting and industrial experiences have not been considered the most advantageous use of a faculty member’s time, relative to achieving promotion and tenure. In engineering technology, prior industrial experience is necessary for appointment.1 At many
Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Education
Rose, A. (2001, June), Consulting And Industrial Experiences As Related To Promotion And Tenure Of Engineering Technology Faculty Paper presented at 2001 Annual Conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico. 10.18260/1-2--9038
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2001 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015