Asee peer logo

Contextual Learning Modules A New Approach To Bioengineering Education

Download Paper |

Conference

2000 Annual Conference

Location

St. Louis, Missouri

Publication Date

June 18, 2000

Start Date

June 18, 2000

End Date

June 21, 2000

ISSN

2153-5965

Page Count

7

Page Numbers

5.170.1 - 5.170.7

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/8239

Download Count

60

Request a correction

Paper Authors

author page

Yi-Xian Qin

author page

Partap Khalsa

author page

Michael Hadjiargyrou

author page

Mark W. Otter

author page

Kenneth J. McLeod

author page

Danny Bluestein

Download Paper |

Abstract
NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

Session 2609

Contextual Learning Modules - A New Approach to Bioengineering Education

Mark W. Otter, Kenneth J. McLeod, Partap Khalsa, Yi-Xian Qin, Michael Hadjiargyrou, and Danny Bluestein

Program in Bioengineering State University of New York Stony Brook, NY 11794-8181

Abstract

A sequence of Bioengineering courses are under development at the State University of New York at Stony Brook, to be used as part of a minor program to introduce students in the College of Arts and Sciences to Bioengineering and as freshmen/sophomore level courses in a Bioengineering major. Each course is composed of a series of contextual learning modules (CLMs) with a common theme, which are 4-6 contact hour modules, each introducing one major engineering concept in a biological context. Approximately one hour is devoted to class discussion of the context, ~3-4 hours doing hands on experimentation coupled with didactic presentation and ~1-2 hours of group participation in a design experience. The intent is to more clearly indicate to the students how the engineering concept may be integrated into their existing "world map" and thereby motivate the students to learn to apply the new knowledge. Our experience thus far suggests that students are enthusiastic about the CLM approach, but future studies will determine whether or not retention of content is improved. One drawback, depending on one’s point of view of the CLM approach is that by increasing discussion of the context within which the material fits and hands-on experiences of the concepts being presented, the amount of content which may be presented in a standard length course must be reduced.

Introduction

Engineering education has undergone several transformations over the last 50 years and we are currently in the midst of another effort to rethink how we train engineers. Following World War II, with the rapid influx of servicemen into engineering schools, curricula were redesigned with greater emphasis on analytical techniques in solid mechanics, fluid mechanics, thermodynamics, heat and mass transfer, electrical theory, and materials science, with a corresponding decrease in both hands-on and synthesis experiences (1,2). Throughout the 1960’s, a continued shift in engineering curricula occurred in the direction of increased emphasis on analytical techniques, due in part to the explosion of knowledge in mathematics and the basic sciences. This represented a transition to the era of engineering science, an era which produced fine analytical engineers, but engineers who were required to learn most, if not all, of their design skills after securing their first engineering position. By the 1980’s, the effect of these shifts was evident in a

Qin, Y., & Khalsa, P., & Hadjiargyrou, M., & Otter, M. W., & McLeod, K. J., & Bluestein, D. (2000, June), Contextual Learning Modules A New Approach To Bioengineering Education Paper presented at 2000 Annual Conference, St. Louis, Missouri. https://peer.asee.org/8239

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2000 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015