Salt Lake City, Utah
June 23, 2018
June 23, 2018
July 27, 2018
Continuing Professional Development
This paper will present the results of a survey of working engineers primarily in the energy sector on their formal continuing education practices and preferences. It will not consider informal training such as reading journals and trade magazines, attending conferences, and mentoring. The survey was given to approximately 80 engineers. The following demographic data was collected: • gender • age range • ethnicity (African American, Asian, Caucasian, Hispanic/Latino, other) • native country & language, length of time lived in the U.S. • highest engineering degree (B.S., M.S., Ph.D.) • highest engineering degree specialty (chemical, electrical, mechanical, etc.) • professional engineering license (yes or no) • primary position / role / function • employer type (industry, academia / education, government, non-profit, other) • years of working experience • employer type (e.g., industry, education, government, non-profit, other) • management role (non-supervisory, middle management, senior management) • total years of work experience Continuing education practices were collected: • number of courses taken each year • typical types of courses taken (e.g., technical; management; environmental, health & safety; legal/compliance, other) • what fraction of the courses are internally taught by the employer • what percentage of the courses taken each year are mandatory • what percentage of the courses taken each year are required by someone other than the employer (e.g., customers, licensing boards, government, etc.) • what percentage of the courses are taken for credit (college, Continuing Education Units, Professional Development Hours) • what percentage of the courses are taken outside normal working hours (e.g., nights, weekends, holidays) Continuing education preferences were collected: • if you could take more training each year, what type would it be (e.g., technical; management; environmental, health & safety; legal/compliance, other) • ranking of the participant’s preferred training delivery method (classroom, online, hybrid) The purpose of the survey is to determine what type of continuing education is currently being done in a particular industry and what would engineers prefer if they had their choice. This information is invaluable to those designing and delivering continuing professional development for engineers.
Baukal, C. E. (2018, June), Continuing Engineering Education Practices and Preferences Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Salt Lake City, Utah. 10.18260/1-2--30223
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2018 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015