Asee peer logo

Creating An "Architecture" For Success In Managing And Balancing The Needs Of The Corporation And Its Employees.

Download Paper |


1997 Annual Conference


Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Publication Date

June 15, 1997

Start Date

June 15, 1997

End Date

June 18, 1997



Page Count


Page Numbers

2.120.1 - 2.120.6



Permanent URL

Download Count


Request a correction

Paper Authors

author page

Nicole F. Barde

Download Paper |

NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

Session 2570

Creating An “Architecture” For Success In Managing And Balancing The Needs Of The Corporation And Its Employees.

Nicole F. Barde Intel Corporation


In 1968, when the Beatles were singing about revolution, Gordon Moore and Robert Noyce were starting one of their own – a technology revolution that would forever change the computer industry and the world. The new company – called Intel Corporation (which stood for “integrated electronics”) – focused on the design and production of large-scale integrated (LSI) memory. Gordon and Bob were soon joined by Andy Grove, who would go on to become Intel’s President and CEO. Intel began in a single room office in Mountain View, CA with a staff of 12 people. First year revenues were $2,672.

The company’s focus was on making semiconductor memory practical. At the time magnetic core memory was 100 times cheaper than semiconductor memory, but that didn’t last long. Talented people flocked to Intel – drawn by the founders’ reputations (Bob was the co- inventor of the integrated circuit and Gordon ran the R&D team that produced them commercially) and the shirtsleeves, achievement-oriented atmosphere that valued hard work and good ideas.

A key part of the vision that the founders had for Intel were some very specific values and operating philosophies which became Intel’s culture. The egalitarian, open culture that characterizes Intel was built into the company from the beginning. Noyce talked about wanting to get away from the “East Coast, old-fashioned, hierarchical business structure” that he had known at Fairchild. In a 1988 interview he said: “I never wanted to be part of a company like that. When we started Intel, I saw it as a community of common interests. It was much more a cooperative venture than an authoritarian structure – a community rather than an army. People came here because of their abilities and we knew we would prosper or fail together... People get respect or get ahead because of their abilities, not their positions. You can always tell the boss he (or she!) is wrong.”

From the beginning, Intel’s future depended on its ability to innovate – and we looked to our employees to bring their different approaches and ideas to the table to fuel the process of change and creativity that was necessary to drive the company forward. Race, gender, age, disability, country of origin didn’t matter; what mattered was the idea, the commitment to keeping Intel on the cutting edge of technology, the drive to do it better. This was an engineering culture, remember. So what mattered at Intel was discipline, speaking with data and solving problems. This could not be a “check your brain at the door” kind of authoritarian culture if

Barde, N. F. (1997, June), Creating An "Architecture" For Success In Managing And Balancing The Needs Of The Corporation And Its Employees. Paper presented at 1997 Annual Conference, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. 10.18260/1-2--6479

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 1997 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015