Seattle, Washington
June 14, 2015
June 14, 2015
June 17, 2015
978-0-692-50180-1
2153-5965
Architectural
9
26.417.1 - 26.417.9
10.18260/p.23756
https://peer.asee.org/23756
972
Dr. Peter Laursen, P.E., is an Associate Professor of Architectural Engineering at the California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo (Cal Poly) where he teaches courses on the analysis and design of structural systems including laboratory courses.
Dr. Cole McDaniel, P.E., is a Professor of Architectural Engineering at the California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo (Cal Poly) where he teaches courses on the analysis and design of structural systems with a focus on seismic behavior.
Dr. Graham Archer, P.Eng., is a Professor of Architectural Engineering at the California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo (Cal Poly) where he teaches courses on the analysis and design of structural systems.
Creating an Experimental Structural Dynamics Laboratory on a Shoe-string BudgetEducating architectural engineers in aspects of structural dynamics is essential. Whenarchitectural engineering students graduate and enter the workforce they will be faced withanalyzing and designing a variety of structural systems. Oftentimes sophisticated analyticalmodels are created to model the dynamic response of buildings subjected to dynamic loading.Commonly these models rely on the modal superposition method resulting in natural frequenciesand modes shapes. The objective of the course is to enhance student learning with student-ledexperimentation that complements the normal textbook theoretical material and homework.This paper describes the development of a course proposal for the graduate level course“Experimental Structural Dynamics Laboratory”. The objectives are to reinforce dynamicstructural analysis concepts relevant to engineers and to visualize that those analytical conceptssuch as natural frequencies and mode shapes exist in real structures through studentexperimentation. The basic notion that sets this laboratory apart from most existing laboratoriesis that the laboratory can be conducted with inexpensive equipment, such as a low capacity shaketable, a linear mass shaker, simple mobile data acquisition equipment and a limited number ofaccelerometers.A series of structural dynamics concepts are explored using physical models and real structures.Concepts explored include natural frequencies, mode shapes, damping, visualization of modalsuperposition, floor vibration, influence of foundation flexibility on the dynamic response, andthe influence of element buckling on the dynamic structural response. Comparison of theexperimental results is made to an analytical model for each of these concepts.The following topics are envisioned for the course: Introduction to laboratory measurements,ambient vibration, forced vibration, natural frequencies, mode shapes, damping and floorvibration in actual buildings, and effects of foundation stiffness and member buckling onbuilding dynamic response.The course will be evaluated and continually improved.
Laursen, P., & McDaniel, C. C., & Archer, G. C. (2015, June), Creating an Experimental Structural Dynamics Laboratory on a Shoe-string Budget Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.23756
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2015 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015