June 22, 2003
June 22, 2003
June 25, 2003
8.344.1 - 8.344.9
Creativity in Design: A Cross-Disciplinary Approach
Kamyar C. Mahboub, Ph.D., P.E., Yinhui Liu, Susantha Chandraratna, and Margaret B. Portillo University of Kentucky Lexington, KY 40506-0281
ABSTRACT The issue of creativity in design was studied within two very diverse disciplines at the University of Kentucky. These disciplines were: Civil Engineering and Interior Design. These two disciplines were selected for their vastly different styles of creativity in practice and pedagogy. The study had two phases. The first phase was to assess the creativity of the freshman class in both disciplines. The second phase was to expose a subset of the students to a series of creativity training modules and assess any shift in their creative abilities. To accomplish this, a statistically valid experiment was designed using “control” and “treatment” groups within each discipline. The data demonstrated improvements in some categories of creativity. This improvement in the creativity index was possible as a result of a special creativity-training module. Future work will include larger pool, and longitudinal creativity studies.
I. INTRODUCTION The premium placed on fostering both critical and creative thinking has increased in the last decade. Calls for creative solutions to problems are becoming ever louder and more insistent in this era. We are witnessing a concomitant resurgence of scholarly interest in creative thinking and creativity in fields such as psychology (Amabile, 1983; Cskszentmihalyi, 1997; Gardner, 1998; Sternberg, 1988) and business (Amabile, 1997, 1998; Kao, 1997). While the scientific as well as fine arts communities have long valued the original and creative individual, the business community increasingly urges their employees to “think outside of the box.” The business world recognizes that creativity offers a competitive edge in a workplace that is characterized by complexity, change, diversity, and globalization (Kao, 1997). Paradoxically, however, standard business practices inhibit creativity and managers who report valuing creativity often do little in practice to support innovation (Amabile, 1998).
A parallel situation is present in post-secondary institutions where disciplines such as engineering and interior design place a premium on creative problem solving yet do
Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education
Mahboub, K. (2003, June), Creativity In Design: A Cross Disciplinary Study Paper presented at 2003 Annual Conference, Nashville, Tennessee. https://peer.asee.org/12345
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2003 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015