June 23, 2013
June 23, 2013
June 26, 2013
23.356.1 - 23.356.10
Curriculum Design of Statics and Dynamics: An Integrated Scaffolding and Hands-on Approach Sudhir Kaul & Pattabhi Sitaram Department of Engineering University of Mount Union Alliance, OH, 44601Statics and Dynamics are necessary fundamental components of the engineering curriculum forMechanical Engineering (ME) and Civil Engineering (CE) students. Students typically take thesecourses at the beginning of their sophomore year and data suggests that many students drop out ofengineering majors around this time. While this may not be directly attributed to Statics andDynamics, it is widely agreed that these courses are challenging for many students. This paperpresents the outline of a recently designed course in Statics and Dynamics with many new featuresthat are not observed in the traditional courses in Statics and Dynamics. The need for designing anew combined course has been necessitated by four factors – a need for incorporating hands-onskills that are increasingly demanded by employers, navigating students through a challengingcourse that is a pre-requisite for other courses, attempting to improve retention of ME and CEstudents, and balancing the credit hour load of students in a liberal education environment wheregeneral education requirements are sizeable. This course has added new learning outcomes toaccommodate laboratory experience as well as use of simulation software to enhance studentengagement and at the same time provide the students with multiple options that encouragedifferent learning styles. The course has been designed for four credit hours consisting of 180minutes of lecture time, 120 minutes of laboratory time and 60 minutes of tutoring time every weekof the fourteen week semester. The contact time has been distributed so as to promote scaffoldingof the learning process. The learning outcomes established for this course include ABET outcomes ‘a’and ‘e’ as well as ABET outcomes ‘b’ and ‘k’. Although it can be argued that the inclusion of morelearning outcomes may overburden the students and require them to allocate more time for thiscourse, the feedback from students for the last two semesters has been generally positive. Thispaper provides the details of the proposed curriculum and explains the rationale behind the changesin a critical course for ME and CE students. It is expected that the proposed curriculum will lead to abroader discussion on the need to revamp critical courses in order to enhance student engagement.
Kaul, S., & Sitaram, P. (2013, June), Curriculum Design of Statics and Dynamics: An Integrated Scaffolding and Hands-on Approach Paper presented at 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia. 10.18260/1-2--19370
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2013 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015