Indianapolis, Indiana
June 15, 2014
June 15, 2014
June 18, 2014
2153-5965
K-12 and Pre-College Engineering Division Curriculum Exchange
K-12 & Pre-College Engineering
3
24.347.1 - 24.347.3
10.18260/1-2--20238
https://peer.asee.org/20238
346
Stephen Ressler, P.E. Ph.D. is Professor Emeritus from the U.S. Military Academy (USMA) at West Point and currently serves as President of the Board of Directors for Engineering Encounters, a non-profit organization founded to promote K-12 engineering outreach. He earned a B.S. degree from USMA in 1979, a Master of Science in Civil Engineering from Lehigh University in 1989, and a Ph.D. from Lehigh in 1991. As an active duty Army officer, he served in a variety of military engineering assignments around the world. He served as a member of the USMA faculty for 21 years, including six years as Professor and Head of the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering. He retired as a Brigadier General in 2013. He is a registered Professional Engineer in Virginia and a Distinguished Member of ASCE.
Catherine Bale is the Director of Outreach for the West Point Center for STEM Education. She holds a B.A. degree in Journalism from the University of Missouri and a M.S. degree in Education from Long Island University.
She has served as the coordinator of the West Point Bridge Design Contest for more than 10 years and spent the last year launching CSE. Additionally, she teaches childhood education classes at Mount Saint Mary College. Previous to her work as a teacher, in educational outreach and in higher education, Ms. Bale was a television news producer and a professional photographer.
As a certified New York State teacher, Ms. Bale’s unique combination of classroom and mass media experience have provided her with a unique platform to organize and initiate quality STEM outreach programs. She has a passion for technology and is an advocate for finding creative ways to engage students and inspire them in the areas of science, technology, engineering and mathematics.
Curriculum Exchange: Cantilever Bridging Submitted for the “Curriculum Exchange” category of the K-12 and Pre-College Engineering Division program.The purpose of the “Cantilever Bridging” activity is to provide an inductive, experientialintroduction to the concept of static equilibrium and its application in structural engineering.From a broader perspective, this activity demonstrates the value of science as a tool in theengineering design process. The activity is best conducted outdoors or in a gymnasium—andthus can be used very effectively to provide a change of pace from traditional indoor classroomactivities.The activity proceeds as follows: • Participants are organized into teams of 4 to 10 students each. • The teams are oriented to the “construction site.” For each team, two bridge abutments (wooden boxes measuring 1 foot wide by 1foot tall by 3 feet long) are placed 9 feet apart, on opposite sides of a simulated river. The simulated river is marked off with tape and is “off limits” to participants. On the near “shore” are two 8-foot-long wooden planks, as well as enough hard hats and work gloves for all team members. • The teams are presented with the problem—to get all members of the team and both planks safely across the river in the shortest possible time. • The teams are briefed on the rules of the game and then are given five minutes to organize themselves and plan their problem-solving strategies. • Construction is begun with “On your mark…get set…build!” The first team to cross all of its members and both planks without any person or plank touching the “river” is declared the winner. • The students are then led on a discussion of the activity and the underlying principles of engineering mechanics that served as the basis for their empirical solution to the bridging problem. The activity concludes with a demonstration of how the basic components used in the bridging activity can be used to model a real-world structure, like the great Firth of Forth cantilever bridge in Scotland. • Following this discussion, the teams are given the opportunity to repeat the exercise— and on this second iteration, the team with the greatest improvement in crossing time is declared the winner. Armed with knowledge of the underlying principles (and with the benefit of having already practiced the task once), the teams’ performance on this second iteration invariably improves substantially.Because the river is 9 feet wide and each plank is only 8 feet long, the only feasible way to solvethis problem is to build a cantilever bridge (see below), with the anchor span extending onlyabout half-way across the river and one or more students standing on its near end to provide acounterweight. Once all but the final team member have crossed, the cantilever configurationmust be reversed in order to get the final student across the river and recover the planks. Thestudent teams rarely recognize this potential solution in their planning, but rather discover itthrough trial and error—as well as observation of the other competing teams. Their improvedperformance on the second iteration serves as the basis for a final discussion on the value ofscience as a tool in engineering design.This activity has been used successfully with students from Grades 4 through 10. For students inthe higher grades, the level of rigor used in the discussion of static equilibrium can be raised.At the Curriculum Exchange session, the authors will demonstrate this activity with a small-scalemodel and with photos of students participating in both indoor and outdoor venues.
Ressler, S. J., & Bale, C. E. (2014, June), Curriculum Exchange: Cantilever Bridging Paper presented at 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana. 10.18260/1-2--20238
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2014 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015