Asee peer logo

Curriculum Innovation And Renewal

Download Paper |


1996 Annual Conference


Washington, District of Columbia

Publication Date

June 23, 1996

Start Date

June 23, 1996

End Date

June 26, 1996



Page Count


Page Numbers

1.134.1 - 1.134.33



Permanent URL

Download Count


Request a correction

Paper Authors

author page

Michael S. Leonard

author page

Donald E. Beasley

author page

D. Jack Elzinga

Download Paper |

NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

Session 3657 Curriculum Innovation and Renewal

Donald E. Beasley, D. Jack Elzinga, Michael S. Leonard

Clemson University / University of Florida / Clemson University

Engineering as a discipline has been taught for centuries. Over the years, a standard engineering curriculum (with many variations) has evolved. However, engineering curriculum development has not followed a structured approach. While accreditation agencies have provided general guidelines, courses were often created and taught by the instructor most interested in the subject area. The result is often a fragmented curriculum in need of more focus and cohesion. Even so, little regard was given to creating a methodology for engineering curriculum development until after World War II. Since that time, several curriculum design methods have been developed. As yet there is no universal agreement on a methodology for curriculum innovation or renewal, and in fact there is significant variation in opinion as to what constitutes a good curriculum. One reason for this lack of a universal methodology is the large number of constraints involved in developing any particular engineering curriculum (e.g., budget, facilities, identification of employer needs, and available faculty time), and effects of these constraints are almost certain to be different from campus to campus. In this paper, we present a framework for continuous improvement concepts that can be applied to engineering curriculum innovation and renewal. While it is neither possible nor desirable to develop a universal engineering curriculum, a systematic means of assessing and continuously improving an existing curriculum as a whole should be valuable to department chairs and engineering faculty. This methodology has been developed to enhance efforts by a department's faculty, led by its chair, to analyze and understand an existing curriculum, to measure and assess input from a variety of informed sources, and to design an improved curriculum in response to the input received. This method delivers a new curriculum aligned with the strategic directions of the department.

1996 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings

Leonard, M. S., & Beasley, D. E., & Elzinga, D. J. (1996, June), Curriculum Innovation And Renewal Paper presented at 1996 Annual Conference, Washington, District of Columbia. 10.18260/1-2--5956

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 1996 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015