Asee peer logo

Decentralization Tendencies By Deans

Download Paper |

Conference

2005 Annual Conference

Location

Portland, Oregon

Publication Date

June 12, 2005

Start Date

June 12, 2005

End Date

June 15, 2005

ISSN

2153-5965

Conference Session

Emerging Trends in Engineering Education Poster Session

Page Count

15

Page Numbers

10.391.1 - 10.391.15

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/14320

Download Count

5

Request a correction

Paper Authors

author page

Gary Martin

Download Paper |

Abstract
NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

Decentralization Tendencies by Deans (Related Software Overview)

Gary Martin, Ed.D. Professor and Assistant Dean University of the Pacific February 23, 2005

Abstract

A survey was conducted with business, education, and engineering deans across the country which revealed a surprising prevalence in decentralized approaches to development, new-student recruitment, career services support, and even record-keeping for enrolled student. A specific comprehensive software package for academic deans and department chairs is outlined which allows academic administrators to track students, alumni, faculty, staff, advisory boards, outreach schools, student recruits, experiential education employers, and school co-op and internship placements.

Introduction

Deans and department chairs are movers and shakers who frequently spur and oversee a wide range of peripheral or support responsibilities for their given programs, including outreach for new students, development of funds and resources, maintenance of current student and alumni records, and even running small-scale career centers and human resources offices. Universities tend to frown on decentralized practices and record- keeping systems in these areas, especially when they are in addition to centralized systems. Such decentralization is viewed as a duplication of efforts which tends to lack the same quality control. In spite of these policies and opinions, deans and chairs often reportedly pursue such practices as much as possible.

The University of the Pacific (Pacific) is a small university with about 6,000 students. The campus has centralized admissions, registration, human resources, career services, and development offices. The university supports decentralized experiential education offices in several academic units including our School of Engineering and Computer Science (SOECS). In spite of all the centralized operations, we (i.e., the SOECS) perform extensive data tracking which seeks to complement these primary centralized campus offices. To support this activity, we migrated to an extensive, comprehensive database system to support and tie all of these functions together.

This paper will first reveal the results of a survey sent to business, education, and engineering deans across the country for the purpose of ascertaining a more empirically based grasp of the extent these academic administrators actually engage themselves and their staffs in these support functions. The balance of this paper will describe the above

1

Martin, G. (2005, June), Decentralization Tendencies By Deans Paper presented at 2005 Annual Conference, Portland, Oregon. https://peer.asee.org/14320

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2005 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015