Asee peer logo

Demystifying the Selection of a Literature Method: A novice researcher learning journey

Download Paper |

Conference

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Publication Date

June 22, 2025

Start Date

June 22, 2025

End Date

August 15, 2025

Conference Session

Engineering Education Methods and Reflections

Tagged Division

Student Division (STDT)

Page Count

11

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/56217

Paper Authors

biography

Qiuxing Chen University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Orcid 16x16 orcid.org/0009-0007-0362-8636

visit author page

Qiuxing Chen is an engineering education doctoral student at the University at Buffalo. She has a training in mechanical engineering and is committed to broadening participation, positive engineering identity, sense of belonging, and student wellbeing in engineering, particularly in mental health spaces. Her research is focused on the Asian and Asian-American lived experiences in engineering education, including the effects of stereotypes, overrepresentation, and culture on engineering identity and mental health for Asian women and ethnic groups.

visit author page

Download Paper |

Abstract

Engineering education as in interdisciplinary field of research that borrows from a variety of areas to build its toolset. From theories to research methods the field is in constant evolution in its adaptation of established practices in other fields to the context of engineering education. One of the challenges faced by novice researchers is the need to decide if one should engage with one literature review method versus another, and to devise the transferability of methods learned. In the early stages of training of engineering education researchers, we get acquainted with different strategies available to conduct literature reviews. Systematic Literature Reviews (SLRs) and Scoping Reviews (SR) have gained popularity as approaches to engage more in depth with existing research in a chosen research topic. One question that we face is: When to decide to conduct one versus the other?

In this paper, we illustrate the learning process generated through such questioning while generating a literature review about the marginalized lived experiences of Asian-American students in engineering. We discuss the different approaches for SRs and SLRs, how they transfer to the context of engineering education, and which adjustments were considered necessary in order to make approaches more useful for the field. The Five-Stage, PICO, and SPIDER frameworks are discussed to depth when considering their transferability and adjustments needed to make their optimal utilization in the engineering education context. The exercise is illustrated by the results of the intended literature review.

The goal of this paper is to make transparent the decision-making process through which novice researchers go through when selecting a type of literature review to engage with for their study. It is intended to demystify the process that is inherent to research endeavor and provide heuristics through which such decision-making can be executed. Initial thoughts about implications for this in the preparation of new engineering education researchers are discussed.

Chen, Q. (2025, June), Demystifying the Selection of a Literature Method: A novice researcher learning journey Paper presented at 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Montreal, Quebec, Canada . https://peer.asee.org/56217

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2025 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015