Asee peer logo

Design As The Priority In Engineering Education: An Implementation In A Senior Project Course

Download Paper |

Conference

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Louisville, Kentucky

Publication Date

June 20, 2010

Start Date

June 20, 2010

End Date

June 23, 2010

ISSN

2153-5965

Conference Session

Design Projects in Mechanical Engineering I

Tagged Division

Mechanical Engineering

Page Count

12

Page Numbers

15.351.1 - 15.351.12

DOI

10.18260/1-2--16369

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/16369

Download Count

50

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Angkee Sripakagorn Chulalongkorn University

visit author page

Angkee Sripakagorn is an Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering at Chulalongkorn University, Thailand. He earned a Ph.D. from the University of Washington, an M.S. from Oregon State University, and a B.Eng. from Chulalongkorn University, all in Mechanical Engineering. His area of expertise is thermal science.

visit author page

biography

Kuntinee Maneeratana Chulalongkorn University

visit author page

Kuntinee Maneeratana is an Associate Professor in Mechanical Engineering at Chulalongkorn University, Thailand. She earned a Ph.D. and a B.Eng. in Mechanical Engineering, both from Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, UK as well as a B.Ed. in Educational Measurement and Evaluation from Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University, Thailand. Her area of expertise is computational mechanics.

visit author page

Download Paper |

Abstract
NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

I. Introduction

Presently, the operation of the mechanical engineering program at Chulalongkorn University, Thailand is under a number of constraints. Firstly, the curriculum has to comply with all requirements and desired outcomes from the governing bodies, both academic and professional. These regulations have profound impacts on the flexibility of the program structure due to the different emphases on contents and outcomes. In addition, the 2008 Chulalongkorn University Act transformed the status of the university from a public university into an autonomous university. The loss of fiscal security and benefits also brought further challenges. Moreover, the competition for students from local institutions and globalization present new threats, challenges and opportunities that a program has to accept and adapt [1]. Thus, it is clear that the methods of teaching and learning must be radically changed in order to ensure the success of the program.

This paper describes an experience in implementing design as the integrative experience of an engineering program via a capstone design course: 2103-499 Mechanical Engineering Project. Prior to this work, the learning experience and assessment in this course was entirely under discretion of faculty members. Project topics included design, programming, industry-related academic services. Even for projects involving design, students, in many cases, never went beyond conceptual design and analyses, hence, missing the integrative experience that this capstone course was supposed to deliver. With the new framework in which design become the priority, the restructuring process was launched in 2006, by Associate Professor Thitima Jintanawan with the authors as members of the administrative committee.

II. Design as an Integrative Experience in an Engineering Program

According to ABET, the operation of a program can be viewed as a two-loop process (Figure 1). A program delivers program outcomes by instilling knowledge and skills to students. When students graduated and go to workplaces, the program monitors and tries to ensure that competencies, described by program educational objectives, are developed during the work experience [2]. At present, the department has moved along a continuous change towards meeting the challenge of completing the program operation in Figure 1. In addition, the program itself is in the process of curriculum revision. The 2103-499 takes this opportunity to close the big loop with the immediate goal of commencing the processes that are deemed lacking, which are denoted by stars in Figure 1.

The two-loop process described in Figure 1 is very general. In terms of design issues in engineering education, however, ABET seems to be much more specific. While ABET is certainly aware of the less-than-major contribution of design in engineering profession [3-6], it picked design as an ultimate goal of engineering education. Very much in the same direction, JABEE stated that “Engineering design cannot be learned simply through class instruction in a few subject courses. In other words, engineering design integrates all aspects of engineering education [7].” The authors, as members of the administrative committee in charge, took up this challenge by initiating and implementing the new framework for the 2103-499. This senior project course has been restructured to provide the design experience as an integrative event of an engineering program.

Sripakagorn, A., & Maneeratana, K. (2010, June), Design As The Priority In Engineering Education: An Implementation In A Senior Project Course Paper presented at 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, Kentucky. 10.18260/1-2--16369

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2010 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015