Asee peer logo

Design Under Alternative Incentives: Teaching Students The Importance Of Feature Selection And Organization In Cad

Download Paper |

Conference

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Austin, Texas

Publication Date

June 14, 2009

Start Date

June 14, 2009

End Date

June 17, 2009

ISSN

2153-5965

Conference Session

Innovative Teaching Strategies in Engineering Graphics

Tagged Division

Engineering Design Graphics

Page Count

11

Page Numbers

14.421.1 - 14.421.11

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/4525

Download Count

12

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Michael Johnson Texas A&M University Orcid 16x16 orcid.org/0000-0001-5328-8763

visit author page

Johnson is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution at Texas A&M University. Prior to joining the faculty at Texas A&M, he was a senior product development engineer at the 3M Corporate Research Laboratory in St. Paul, Minnesota for three years. He received his B.S. in mechanical engineering from Michigan State University and his S.M. and Ph.D. from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Johnson’s research focuses on design tools, specifically, the cost modeling and analysis of product development and manufacturing systems; design methodology; and engineering education.

visit author page

Download Paper |

Abstract
NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

Introduction Today’s engineering students will enter a work environment where the use of computer-aided design tools is ubiquitous. CAD tools are used throughout the design process 1. CAD tools are also used to facilitate global development projects with engineers located around the world all working on the same project 2. When used in concert with product lifecycle management systems; a complete library of CAD models can be accessed by engineers around the world 3. These trends increase the importance of designing in a manner that is both intuitively organized and amenable to change.

The design intent of a model should capture its function and allow the model to be easily altered 4-6 . Design intent is at the core of the CAD modeling process, encompassing feature* selection, order, and organization 4. To produce models that are amenable to change and use modern CAD tools to their full potential, the focus of CAD courses should be around how to convey design intent. Unfortunately, most CAD modeling instruction is focused on teaching declarative knowledge – the key strokes and button picks required to perform certain tasks in specific software platforms 7-8. Design intent would fall under the category of strategic knowledge 9. This type of knowledge can transcend a particular CAD program or version 10. It is important that students learn knowledge that is easily transferable, given the number of CAD programs available and the rate at which they update. Rynne et al, cite attributes such as: proper location and orientation of the base feature, use of symmetry, simple and well defined sketches, correct feature termination, and correct duplication methods as promoting proper design intent 11.

The importance of design intent is difficult to convey without some type of alteration to an existing model. Unfortunately, in most CAD courses students design components that are never altered, or in some cases only altered by the original designer. This is the case even though such exercises are viewed as beneficial in teaching students how to design 12. To demonstrate the importance of design intent to students, a model alteration exercise is presented in the next section. The results of the exercise from one semester are presented in the following section.

Background and Exercise Description The exercise described in this paper was prepared for a junior-level design course in a mechanical and manufacturing engineering technology program. CAD is taught as the laboratory portion of the course. The laboratory is one hour and fifty minutes long. The software used in the course is Pro/Engineer Wildfire 3.0. Most students had some experience with a CAD program previously (e.g., AutoCAD or SolidWorks). Very few students had experience with the Pro/Engineer software package (which the course uses). The laboratory is focused on creating models that are easy to alter and showing the effects of alterations when modeling using different methods. The exercise was carried out near the end of the semester after the students had been instructed in basic and intermediate part modeling. * Features are the building blocks of parametric CAD models. Depending on the software, they include basic elements (e.g., blocks, bosses, pockets, or holes) or sketch manipulations (e.g., extrusions, revolves, or blends).

Johnson, M. (2009, June), Design Under Alternative Incentives: Teaching Students The Importance Of Feature Selection And Organization In Cad Paper presented at 2009 Annual Conference & Exposition, Austin, Texas. https://peer.asee.org/4525

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2009 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015