June 24, 2007
June 24, 2007
June 27, 2007
Nuclear and Radiological
12.471.1 - 12.471.13
Designing an Activity-based Curriculum for Radiation Protection Personnel Introduction
Recent reports show a need for roughly 90,000 new nuclear employees in the next 10 years. Loss of Radiation Protection personnel (RPs) at nuclear power plants will exceed 57% over the next five years, and over 1,000 replacement radiation protection workers will be needed. This does not include the needs at the US Department of Energy or the impact due to the creation of new jobs from new nuclear power plant construction. Radiation protection personnel serve in numerous facilities that regulate work with radioactive materials in nuclear power plants, Department of Energy facilities, radiopharmaceutical manufacturers, hospitals and research facilities, food irradiation facilities, and university research reactors. Their primary function is to protect other workers from radiation exposure, transport and monitor radioactive materials, and assess exposures to radiation workers.
With the support of a Department of Labor grant, we have designed and will be implementing a certified Associates of Applied Science Degree in Nuclear Technology degree program to contribute toward meeting the energy industry’s manpower needs for RPs and to ensure that the demand for qualified, skilled workers is met throughout the U.S. In this paper, we describe our methods for designing the RP curriculum, which began with an extensive needs analysis process. Our needs analysis included an activity analysis, a contextual analysis, and a follow-up task analysis to inform the design of this program. Initial results indicate a need for a curriculum that focuses on task-oriented knowledge acquisition in contexts that support authentic learning.
During the initial phase of the project, we performed a needs analysis in order to determine the requirements for the RP academic program. The most common kind of needs analysis for determining curricular requirements identifies the topics or concepts that graduates should know when they have completed the instructional program. More traditional topic-oriented curricula typically result in learning objectives that emphasize recall of concepts. For example, as part of our needs analysis, we analyzed Department of Energy (DOE) and Institute of Nuclear Power Operations’ (INPO) RP training objectives. Our analysis showed that, of all learning objectives, 60% focused on memorization, 18% on comprehension of ideas, 18% on application, 3% on analysis, and less then 1% on evaluation of knowledge. Our analysis of the kind of knowledge required by these objectives showed that 52% focused on factual knowledge, 21% on conceptual knowledge, 27% on procedural knowledge, and less than 1% on meta-cognitive knowledge. Our needs analysis also showed that the nuclear industry is probably the most highly regulated in the world, with extensive rules and guidelines provided by the Department of Energy, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and numerous other task-specific agencies. Given the highly regulated nature of the industry, accountability is essential to these organizations, as well it should be. Too often, accountability is associated with memorization because memorization is the easiest and most reliable form of assessment. However, given the complexity of the tasks that RPs regularly perform and the importance of their performance to the safety of workers potentially exposed to radioactive sources, memorization is insufficient for their preparation. Given the complexity of their tasks and the broad range of contexts in which radiation protection must be provided, the ability to perform numerous problem-solving tasks is essential to job success. Therefore, in order to assess performance needs, we needed a more robust form of analysis for a articulating the curriculum. RPs
Jonassen, D., & Schmidt, M., & Easter, M., & Marra, R., & Miller, W. (2007, June), Designing An Activity Based Curriculum For Radiation Protection Personnel Paper presented at 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, Hawaii. https://peer.asee.org/1507
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2007 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015