Abdul, B., & Thiessen, D. B., & Van Wie, B. J., & Brown, G. R., & Adesope, O. O. (2012, June), Development and Deployment of a Rubric Based on Fink’s Cognitive Dimensions in a Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer Class with Potential Applications in a Variety of Engineering Classes  Paper presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas. 10.18260/1-2--21199

\bibitem{asee_peer_21199}
  Abdul, B., \& Thiessen, D. B., \& Van Wie, B. J., \& Brown, G. R., \& Adesope, O. O. (2012, June), \emph{Development and Deployment of a Rubric Based on Fink’s Cognitive Dimensions in a Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer Class with Potential Applications in a Variety of Engineering Classes}
  Paper presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition, San Antonio, Texas.
  10.18260/1-2--21199

Baba Abdul, David B. Thiessen, Bernard J. Van Wie, Gary Robert Brown, and Olusola O. Adesope.  "Development and Deployment of a Rubric Based on Fink’s Cognitive Dimensions in a Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer Class with Potential Applications in a Variety of Engineering Classes".  2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas, 2012, June.  ASEE Conferences, 2012.  https://peer.asee.org/21199 Internet.  25 Apr, 2024

\bibitem{asee_peer_21199}
  Baba Abdul, David B. Thiessen, Bernard J. Van Wie, Gary Robert Brown, and Olusola O. Adesope.
  "Development and Deployment of a Rubric Based on Fink’s Cognitive Dimensions in a Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer Class with Potential Applications in a Variety of Engineering Classes".
  \emph{2012 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition, San Antonio, Texas, 2012, June}.
  ASEE Conferences, 2012.
  https://peer.asee.org/21199 Internet.  25 Apr, 2024

@INPROCEEDINGS{asee_peer_21199
author = "Baba Abdul, David B. Thiessen, Bernard J. Van Wie, Gary Robert Brown, and Olusola O. Adesope"
title = "Development and Deployment of a Rubric Based on Fink’s Cognitive Dimensions in a Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer Class with Potential Applications in a Variety of Engineering Classes"
booktitle = "2012 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition"
year = "2012"
month = "June"
address = "San Antonio, Texas"
publisher = "ASEE Conferences"
note = {https://peer.asee.org/21199}
number = {10.18260/1-2--21199}
}

TY  - CPAPER
AB  -  Development and Deployment of a Rubric Based on Fink’s CognitiveDimensions in a Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer Class with Potential           Applications in a Variety of Engineering ClassesThere is a need for better and more objective assessments of student cognition especially at theengineering college level. This is important to capture essential intellectual abilities that may bemissed through conventional testing, produce assessments that are far more descriptive ofstudent cognition than a single holistic grade, link learning outcomes and professionalcompetencies, enable multiple evaluators to apply the same criteria to judge the same work anddesign better formative interventions. This paper reports on the development and subsequentdeployment of a rubric based on Fink’s cognitive dimensions of Foundational Knowledge (F),Application (A) and Integration (I) in a Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer (FMHT) class thoughit has potential broader multi-disciplinary applicability. Professors from Chemical Engineering,Mechanical Engineering and Education alongside graduate students from Chemical Engineeringwere involved in the development of the rubric. Definitions of what exactly constitute F, A and Iin the subject domain were negotiated, scales indicating levels of performance were agreed uponand a minimum competency “anchor” line was drawn. Deployment of the rubric was donefollowing a Convergent Participation Model (CPM) to be described in the body of the paper.Three main types of assessment artifacts namely traditional text-book problems, professor-crafted worksheets and final examination problems were rated for the aforementioned cognitivedimensions. A portion (25%) of the anonymous artifacts were selected and rated by 2 differentpanels consisting of professors and graduates students involved in the rubric development, orotherwise trained in its use. Our premise was that we would see consistent ratings for the F, A,and I dimensions and that ratings for the worksheets would be identical to those for traditionaltextbook problems. However, the three dimensions were found to produce different ratings,depending on the depth and complexity of the assignment, and the three types of assessmentartifacts were found to differ significantly in rubric outcomes. These and other interestingfindings are discussed with a view to designing better learning experiences and assessments.
AU  - Baba Abdul
AU  - David B. Thiessen
AU  - Bernard J. Van Wie
AU  - Gary Robert Brown
AU  - Olusola O. Adesope
CY  - San Antonio, Texas
DA  - 2012/06/10
PB  - ASEE Conferences
TI  - Development and Deployment of a Rubric Based on Fink’s Cognitive Dimensions in a Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer Class with Potential Applications in a Variety of Engineering Classes
UR  - https://peer.asee.org/21199
DO  - 10.18260/1-2--21199
ER  -