June 26, 2011
June 26, 2011
June 29, 2011
22.469.1 - 22.469.20
Development and Implementation of an Intermediate Design Course Using Active LearningSix years ago, the Mechanical Engineering Department at *****, after many heated debates,approved a major curriculum change that included adding a Design Methodology course, andeliminating courses in Kinematics and Thermodynamics II. This action was taken to better alignwith ABET curriculum objectives, particularly in the area of Design. The primary objective ofthe Design Methodology course is to reinforce and expand on the foundation laid in a Design andGraphics course taken in the first year, and to better prepare students to satisfy an industrialclient in the senior capstone course. It is intended to help fill the void in the 2nd and 3rd yearswhere students were previously pre-occupied with lecture-based, fundamental courses with littleopportunity to design or practice. It is a required course for all Mechanical Engineering andNuclear Engineering majors and is typically taken in the 6th semester.The course was designed from a set of learning objectives and emphasizes design thinking,decision making, and professional skills including communications and effective teaming.Philosophically, this course attempts to strike a balance between the art and science of design. Aconcurrent approach is used, where theory and application are presented simultaneously usingthe design process as the underlying theme. Product design, dissection, and reverse engineeringprojects are employed to motivate student learning, and to allow them to apply and practicecourse concepts. Each class meeting (2 hours, twice per week) consists of a brief presentation orworkshop and a hands-on activity to illustrate and apply that material. Wherever possible, a just-in-time approach is followed, where the class material is designed to satisfy a need forknowledge to complete a project.After 5 years of operation, the course has achieved its objectives and was singled out for specialrecognition in our latest ABET review. The student “word on the street” is that the course is alot of work but they learned a lot. Formative and summative assessment tools are used to gatherstudent feedback for continuous improvement. Assessment results show that students who havetaken this course are much more confident in their abilities to manage and complete an open-ended design project involving multiple trade-offs. There has also been a noticeableimprovement in student performance in their capstone course. Due to this success, the ElectricalEngineering Department is instituting a similar course tailored to the needs of their students.The challenges include: high enrollments (10 sections per year, 30 students per section),coordination between multiple instructors and sections, and providing an active learningenvironment for large numbers of students. This paper discusses the development, operation,and results of this course.
Lamancusa, J. S., & Pauley, L. L. (2011, June), Development and Implementation of an Intermediate Design Course Using Active Learning Paper presented at 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC. 10.18260/1-2--17750
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2011 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015