Discussion Lead Paper for TELPhE Session on AI
- Conference
- Location
-
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Publication Date
-
June 22, 2025
- Start Date
-
June 22, 2025
- End Date
-
August 15, 2025
- Conference Session
- Tagged Division
-
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE)
- Page Count
-
2
- Permanent URL
-
https://peer.asee.org/56300
Paper Authors
Jerry W. Gravander Clarkson University
JERRY W. GRAVANDER is past chair of Clarkson's University's Department of Humanities and Social Sciences and currently is the co-chair of Clarkson University's Department of Arts, Culture and Technology. He has written and presented widely on liberal education for engineering students, as well as engineering ethics and the philosophy of engineering. He was the 1996 recipient of the Sterling Olmstead Award of ASEE's Liberal Education Division.
Abstract
This paper provides a framework for discussion of the AI topics, themes, and issues raised and addressed by the papers in this session. Viewed at the most general level, these papers span a broad range of current thinking and practice regarding AI in engineering education. One of the four papers presents and analyzes data from a survey regarding faculty and student attitudes toward using AI in engineering education, including concerns about its appropriate uses. Two papers present examples of the successful use of AI tools to improve a specific course. The fourth paper gives an overview of a college-wide effort to re-conceptualize and redesign its engineering curricula so that AI tools are integrated throughout and students are prepared for the work they will do as engineers after graduation.
This paper will provide a discussion-initiating commentary on the papers in the session by adding specific details from each of them that flesh out the above general descriptions, and I will add a couple of examples that expand on what I see as the core of the curriculum redesign effort described in the fourth paper. Changes in technology have frequently led to changes in engineering education, for example, paper, ink, and T-square technical drawing courses have disappeared, and our students no longer use slide rules. The engineering education community has been reactive regarding such past changes rather than proactive. I view the curricular project described in the fourth paper as proactive, and I will add two or three brief descriptions of other proactive responses.
My presentation in the conference session will be brief and pointed, and I plan to transition directly from my comments to a general discussion based on all of the presentations.
Gravander, J. W. (2025, June), Discussion Lead Paper for TELPhE Session on AI Paper presented at 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Montreal, Quebec, Canada . https://peer.asee.org/56300
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2025 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015