Chicago, Illinois
June 18, 2006
June 18, 2006
June 21, 2006
2153-5965
Mechanical Engineering
15
11.503.1 - 11.503.15
10.18260/1-2--414
https://peer.asee.org/414
389
Peter Avitabile is an Associate Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department and the Director of the Modal Analysis and Controls Laboratory at the University of Massachusetts Lowell. He is a Registered Professional Engineer with a BS, MS and Doctorate in Mechanical Engineering and a member of ASEE, ASME and SEM.
Tracy is a graduate student in the Mechanical Engineering Department at the University of Massachusetts. She is currently working on her Master’s Degrees in the Modal Analysis and Controls Laboratory while concurrently working on an NSF Engineering Education Grant directed towards integrating STEM material critical for understanding dynamic systems response.
Jeff is a graduate student in the Mechanical Engineering Department at the University of Massachusetts. He is currently working on his Master’s Degrees in the Modal Analysis and Controls Laboratory while concurrently working on an NSF Engineering Education Grant directed towards integrating STEM material critical for understanding dynamic systems response.
Nels is a graduate student in the Mechanical Engineering Department at the University of Massachusetts. He is currently working on his Master’s Degrees in the Modal Analysis and Controls Laboratory while concurrently working on an NSF Engineering Education Grant directed towards integrating STEM material critical for understanding dynamic systems response.
DYNAMIC SYSTEMS TEACHING ENHANCEMENT USING A LABORATORY BASED PROJECT (R.U.B.E.)
Abstract
A Dynamic Systems course always relies on materials from previous mathematics and engineering courses. In Mechanical Engineering, these underlying courses are critical to the student’s success in understanding Dynamic System’s material. However, students rarely see the inter-relationship between material from different courses since there is no obvious common link. A Dynamic Systems course must allow the student to see the inter-relationship of this material.
A new variation of this course has been incrementally developed over the past few years to include both an analytical project and a laboratory based project to help the students firmly grasp the material. The analytical project is an individual effort in which the student solves a second- order differential equation using multiple methods: closed-form solution, Laplace transform, and MATLAB and Simulink solutions. Each student has a different set of parameters defined based on student ID information. This reminds the students of the foundation differential equations knowledge they will require for the remainder of the course.
An updated laboratory project on a second order mechanical system further enhances the student’s understanding. The students use a system referred to as RUBE (Response Under Basic Excitation). The RUBE system is an internet-based data acquisition system for a second order mass-spring-dashpot system. The system has variable mechanical parameters—it changes every time it is operated so that no two sets of data are alike (variable input, variable mass, variable stiffness). This forces each student to process his/her own data, as it will be slightly different from data sets collected by other students. Students work in groups, collect data, and prepare detailed reports summarizing their efforts. Students also perform a peer review of submitted projects, providing another valuable learning experience.
Assessments of the first three semesters of the project clearly indicate that the students enjoyed the hands-on project and clearly felt that they understood the material in much greater depth as a result of the project.
I. Problem
Understanding basic STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics) material is critical to a student’s ability to progress satisfactorily in upper level courses. Earlier courses often appear to have no relevance, from a student’s perspective. As a result, students feel that they do not command the subject matter well enough and sometimes feel that it is too late to catch up on review what they now realize they should have already known from previous courses. Figure 1 shows a cartoon expressing the student’s eventual realization as they approach the latter part of the undergraduate educational career.
Avitabile, P., & Van Zandt, T., & Hodgkins, J., & Wirkkala, N. (2006, June), Dynamic Systems Teaching Enhancement Using A Laboratory Based Project (Rube) Paper presented at 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago, Illinois. 10.18260/1-2--414
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2006 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015