June 26, 2011
June 26, 2011
June 29, 2011
K-12 & Pre-College Engineering and Educational Research and Methods
22.517.1 - 22.517.12
Rural, American Indian Early Student Engineering Interests and AttitudesA team of multidisciplinary university researchers in collaboration with local tribal and public schoolofficials, have engaged in a project to measure changes in young students’ STEM interests, achievement,and attitudes over three years and relate these changes to identifiable parent/teacher influences. Thisresearch follows a modified intersectional theory approach to consider the interdependence of school andhome cultures on attitudes and interests in science and math. Research questions are: What are the red-light (stop) and green-light (go) signals in the elementary school years that encourage or discouragescience and math interests, specifically among rural American Indian girls? What science and mathteaching practices encourage girls’ STEM interests within this population? The main objective of thisproject is to determine significant predictors of low-income, rural American Indian boys’ and girls’ earlyinterests in STEM with the long-term goal to provide new guidance for classroom practices thatencourage young girls’ STEM interests. The targeted school region includes large numbers of low,socio-economic status (SES) students (those eligible for free and reduced-price meals) and NativeAmericans. The study includes 584 students (with approximately 50% Native American students) ingrades 3rd – 5thth with similar numbers of girls and boys at each level.The presented part of this study examines an engineering subscale of a developed interest and attitudeinstrument. The “gold” standard in math and science interest assessment is the Fennema andSherman’s measure; however the original measure was developed for high school students andadults and is too long. None of the shorter modified versions had been used with children asyoung as our sample and they were all still too long. The research team chose to develop amodification by looking for redundant or difficult to understand items. The developed measurehas 30 items and good reliability (Cronbach’s α = .91; subscale reliabilities ranged from .78 to.84).The researchers developed an engineering subscale from the survey. The “who should do theseactivities” subscale for children had an acceptable alpha of .76, but the “engineering what I do inmy free time” did not, but it had fewer items (α = .56). An egalitarian belief scale in whoshould do engineering-related activities and rating of how often one does them were created. The“should measure” consisted of fly model airplane, build with tools, fix bikes, draw (or design)buildings, draw (or design) cars/rockets, and build model airplanes. The activities subscaleconsisted of build forts, fix a car, build with tools, and (draw or design) cars or rockets.Overall, higher engineering egalitarianism scores were related to higher math efficacy, utility,and egalitarianism scores and higher science egalitarianism and efficacy scores. Higherengineering activity scores were related to higher math efficacy, utility, mother and father scoresand science efficacy and lower math and science egalitarianism scores.
High, K. A., & Page, M. C., & Thomas, J. (2011, June), Early Engineering Interests and Attitudes: Can We Identify Them? Paper presented at 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC. 10.18260/1-2--17798
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2011 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015